Both adapters' act-pr stances gain git fetch and git merge so a
conflicted PR can be resolved by merging main into the branch. History
rewriting is denied outright rather than merely unlisted — the plain
'git push' allow would otherwise cover the force spellings — via deny
rules in the claude settings and last-match-wins deny globs in the
opencode config. git rebase stays absent and denied in both.
act-pr.md teaches the flow: merge origin/main, honour both sides'
intent, tests green, the resolution in its own commit naming files and
choices, covered explicitly in the report — and refuse semantic
conflicts (main made the branch's premise false) by aborting the merge
and naming the collision for a human. The adapters README records the
widened contract.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
BOARD_AGENT_MODEL picks one model for every headless launch;
BOARD_AGENT_MODEL_WORK / _ACT_PR / _REVIEW beat it per intent (review
covers PR reviews and relevance checks). Empty — the default — means
the variable never reaches the adapter and the vendor's own resolution
applies, exactly today's behaviour; a stray AGENT_MODEL in the board's
own environment is stripped rather than inherited silently.
Core carries the name as an opaque string: config resolves intent →
model, _launch passes it as AGENT_MODEL, and each adapter renders it
natively — claude appends --model, opencode sets the generated
config's model key ("provider/model-id", per its docs). The resolved
model (or its absence) is recorded on the agent record, so the
Sessions and Focus views state what a run actually rode instead of
leaving it to whoever's machine the board happens to run on.
Stub-binary tests pin the byte-identical-when-unset guarantee, the
per-intent resolution, the launch-env seam and the record.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
AGENTS.md is the cross-vendor name (opencode, Codex, Gemini CLI read it
natively; so does current Claude Code), and the brief goes to every
vendor's agents — an opencode work agent previously launched with no
project brief at all. The content moves verbatim to AGENTS.md at the
root and in manager/local/; each CLAUDE.md becomes a load-bearing
compatibility pointer (@AGENTS.md import) for older Claude Code CLIs.
update.sh's core-owned file list now carries both names, so updating an
old-layout install lands AGENTS.md and replaces the full CLAUDE.md with
the pointer instead of resurrecting it. All four core prompts, README,
the board.py/taskfiles.py docstrings, the task template and the adapter
contract docs now name AGENTS.md; adapters/README.md notes that vendors
reading AGENTS.md from the working tree need no adapter work.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Work agents were launched under acceptEdits with no Bash allowlist, so
headless runs could edit files but never run tests or commit — the exact
contradiction card 05 documents. Each launch intent (work, act-pr,
review) now carries a permissions.allow list granting exactly what its
prompt demands, delivered through the same generated settings JSON as
the event hooks. Project test/check commands arrive as neutral prefixes
via BOARD_AGENT_COMMANDS; a new opencode adapter renders the same three
stances in its config language as the portability proof. A clean agent
exit with an empty branch no longer advances the card to review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Everything core from cicero-pas's .task-manager, with instance data
reduced to skeleton: empty stage directories, the task template, empty
local/ scaffolding, and a README covering install (clone into
.task-manager/, vendored on purpose) and update (update.sh replaces core
wholesale; local/ and tasks/ survive).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
