# BUSINESS_SYMBOLS.md - Business Analysis Symbol System Enhanced symbol system for business panel analysis with strategic focus and efficiency optimization. ## Business-Specific Symbols ### Strategic Analysis | Symbol | Meaning | Usage Context | |--------|---------|---------------| | 🎯 | strategic target, objective | Key goals and outcomes | | πŸ“ˆ | growth opportunity, positive trend | Market growth, revenue increase | | πŸ“‰ | decline, risk, negative trend | Market decline, threats | | πŸ’° | financial impact, revenue | Economic drivers, profit centers | | βš–οΈ | trade-offs, balance | Strategic decisions, resource allocation | | πŸ† | competitive advantage | Unique value propositions, strengths | | πŸ”„ | business cycle, feedback loop | Recurring patterns, system dynamics | | 🌊 | blue ocean, new market | Uncontested market space | | 🏭 | industry, market structure | Competitive landscape | | πŸŽͺ | remarkable, purple cow | Standout products, viral potential | ### Framework Integration | Symbol | Expert | Framework Element | |--------|--------|-------------------| | πŸ”¨ | Christensen | Jobs-to-be-Done | | βš”οΈ | Porter | Five Forces | | πŸŽͺ | Godin | Purple Cow/Remarkable | | 🌊 | Kim/Mauborgne | Blue Ocean | | πŸš€ | Collins | Flywheel Effect | | πŸ›‘οΈ | Taleb | Antifragile/Robustness | | πŸ•ΈοΈ | Meadows | System Structure | | πŸ’¬ | Doumont | Clear Communication | | 🧭 | Drucker | Management Fundamentals | ### Analysis Process | Symbol | Process Stage | Description | |--------|---------------|-------------| | πŸ” | investigation | Initial analysis and discovery | | πŸ’‘ | insight | Key realizations and breakthroughs | | 🀝 | consensus | Expert agreement areas | | ⚑ | tension | Productive disagreement | | 🎭 | debate | Adversarial analysis mode | | ❓ | socratic | Question-driven exploration | | 🧩 | synthesis | Cross-framework integration | | πŸ“‹ | conclusion | Final recommendations | ### Business Logic Flow | Symbol | Meaning | Business Context | |--------|---------|------------------| | β†’ | causes, leads to | Market trends β†’ opportunities | | β‡’ | strategic transformation | Current state β‡’ desired future | | ← | constraint, limitation | Resource limits ← budget | | ⇄ | mutual influence | Customer needs ⇄ product development | | ∴ | strategic conclusion | Market analysis ∴ go-to-market strategy | | ∡ | business rationale | Expand ∡ market opportunity | | ≑ | strategic equivalence | Strategy A ≑ Strategy B outcomes | | β‰  | competitive differentiation | Our approach β‰  competitors | ## Expert Voice Symbols ### Communication Styles | Expert | Symbol | Voice Characteristic | |--------|--------|---------------------| | Christensen | πŸ“š | Academic, methodical | | Porter | πŸ“Š | Analytical, data-driven | | Drucker | 🧠 | Wise, fundamental | | Godin | πŸ’¬ | Conversational, provocative | | Kim/Mauborgne | 🎨 | Strategic, value-focused | | Collins | πŸ“– | Research-driven, disciplined | | Taleb | 🎲 | Contrarian, risk-aware | | Meadows | 🌐 | Holistic, systems-focused | | Doumont | ✏️ | Precise, clarity-focused | ## Synthesis Output Templates ### Discussion Mode Synthesis ```markdown ## 🧩 SYNTHESIS ACROSS FRAMEWORKS **🀝 Convergent Insights**: [Where multiple experts agree] - 🎯 Strategic alignment on [key area] - πŸ’° Economic consensus around [financial drivers] - πŸ† Shared view of competitive advantage **βš–οΈ Productive Tensions**: [Strategic trade-offs revealed] - πŸ“ˆ Growth vs πŸ›‘οΈ Risk management (Taleb ⚑ Collins) - 🌊 Innovation vs πŸ“Š Market positioning (Kim/Mauborgne ⚑ Porter) **πŸ•ΈοΈ System Patterns** (Meadows analysis): - Leverage points: [key intervention opportunities] - Feedback loops: [reinforcing/balancing dynamics] **πŸ’¬ Communication Clarity** (Doumont optimization): - Core message: [essential strategic insight] - Action priorities: [implementation sequence] **⚠️ Blind Spots**: [Gaps requiring additional analysis] **πŸ€” Strategic Questions**: [Next exploration priorities] ``` ### Debate Mode Synthesis ```markdown ## ⚑ PRODUCTIVE TENSIONS RESOLVED **Initial Conflict**: [Primary disagreement area] - πŸ“š **CHRISTENSEN position**: [Innovation framework perspective] - πŸ“Š **PORTER counter**: [Competitive strategy challenge] **πŸ”„ Resolution Process**: [How experts found common ground or maintained productive tension] **🧩 Higher-Order Solution**: [Strategy that honors multiple frameworks] **πŸ•ΈοΈ Systems Insight** (Meadows): [How the debate reveals deeper system dynamics] ``` ### Socratic Mode Synthesis ```markdown ## πŸŽ“ STRATEGIC THINKING DEVELOPMENT **πŸ€” Question Themes Explored**: - Framework lens: [Which expert frameworks were applied] - Strategic depth: [Level of analysis achieved] **πŸ’‘ Learning Insights**: - Pattern recognition: [Strategic thinking patterns developed] - Framework integration: [How to combine expert perspectives] **🧭 Next Development Areas**: [Strategic thinking capabilities to develop further] ``` ## Token Efficiency Integration ### Compression Strategies - **Expert Voice Compression**: Maintain authenticity while reducing verbosity - **Framework Symbol Substitution**: Use symbols for common framework concepts - **Structured Output**: Organized templates reducing repetitive text - **Smart Abbreviation**: Business-specific abbreviations with context preservation ### Business Abbreviations ```yaml common_terms: 'comp advantage': 'competitive advantage' 'value prop': 'value proposition' 'go-to-market': 'GTM' 'total addressable market': 'TAM' 'customer acquisition cost': 'CAC' 'lifetime value': 'LTV' 'key performance indicator': 'KPI' 'return on investment': 'ROI' 'minimum viable product': 'MVP' 'product-market fit': 'PMF' frameworks: 'jobs-to-be-done': 'JTBD' 'blue ocean strategy': 'BOS' 'good to great': 'G2G' 'five forces': '5F' 'value chain': 'VC' 'four actions framework': 'ERRC' ``` ## Mode Configuration ### Default Settings ```yaml business_panel_config: # Expert Selection max_experts: 5 min_experts: 3 auto_select: true diversity_optimization: true # Analysis Depth phase_progression: adaptive synthesis_required: true cross_framework_validation: true # Output Control symbol_compression: true structured_templates: true expert_voice_preservation: 0.85 # Integration mcp_sequential_primary: true mcp_context7_patterns: true persona_coordination: true ``` ### Performance Optimization - **Token Budget**: 15-30K tokens for comprehensive analysis - **Expert Caching**: Store expert personas for session reuse - **Framework Reuse**: Cache framework applications for similar content - **Synthesis Templates**: Pre-structured output formats for efficiency - **Parallel Analysis**: Where possible, run expert analysis in parallel ## Quality Assurance ### Authenticity Validation - **Voice Consistency**: Each expert maintains characteristic communication style - **Framework Fidelity**: Analysis follows authentic framework methodology - **Interaction Realism**: Expert interactions reflect realistic professional dynamics - **Synthesis Integrity**: Combined insights maintain individual framework value ### Business Analysis Standards - **Strategic Relevance**: Analysis addresses real business strategic concerns - **Implementation Feasibility**: Recommendations are actionable and realistic - **Evidence Base**: Conclusions supported by framework logic and business evidence - **Professional Quality**: Analysis meets executive-level business communication standards