# Code of Conduct ## 🤝 Our Commitment SuperClaude Framework is committed to fostering an inclusive, professional, and collaborative community focused on advancing AI-assisted software development. We welcome contributors of all backgrounds, experience levels, and perspectives to participate in building better development tools and workflows. **Our Mission**: Create a supportive environment where software developers can learn, contribute, and innovate together while maintaining the highest standards of technical excellence and professional conduct. **Core Values**: Technical merit, inclusive collaboration, continuous learning, and practical utility guide all community interactions and decisions. ## 🎯 Our Standards ### Positive Behavior ✅ **Professional Communication:** - Use clear, technical language appropriate for software development discussions - Provide constructive feedback with specific examples and actionable suggestions - Ask clarifying questions before making assumptions about requirements or implementations - Share knowledge and experience to help others learn and improve **Collaborative Development:** - Focus on technical merit and project goals in all discussions and decisions - Respect different experience levels and provide mentorship opportunities - Acknowledge contributions and give credit where appropriate - Participate in code review with constructive, educational feedback **Inclusive Participation:** - Welcome newcomers with patience and helpful guidance - Use inclusive language that considers diverse backgrounds and perspectives - Provide context and explanations for technical decisions and recommendations - Create learning opportunities through documentation and examples **Quality Focus:** - Maintain high standards for code quality, documentation, and user experience - Prioritize user value and practical utility in feature discussions - Support evidence-based decision making with testing and validation - Contribute to long-term project sustainability and maintainability **Community Building:** - Participate in discussions with good faith and positive intent - Share workflows, patterns, and solutions that benefit the community - Help others troubleshoot issues and learn framework capabilities - Celebrate community achievements and milestones ### Unacceptable Behavior ❌ **Disrespectful Communication:** - Personal attacks, insults, or derogatory comments about individuals or groups - Harassment, trolling, or deliberately disruptive behavior - Discriminatory language or behavior based on personal characteristics - Public or private harassment of community members **Unprofessional Conduct:** - Deliberately sharing misinformation or providing harmful technical advice - Spamming, advertising unrelated products, or promotional content - Attempting to manipulate discussions or decision-making processes - Violating intellectual property rights or licensing terms **Destructive Behavior:** - Sabotaging project infrastructure, code, or community resources - Intentionally introducing security vulnerabilities or malicious code - Sharing private or confidential information without permission - Deliberately disrupting project operations or community activities **Technical Misconduct:** - Submitting plagiarized code or claiming others' work as your own - Knowingly providing incorrect or misleading technical information - Ignoring security best practices or introducing unnecessary risks - Circumventing established review processes or quality gates **Community Violations:** - Violating project licensing terms or contributor agreements - Using community platforms for commercial promotion without permission - Creating multiple accounts to circumvent moderation or bans - Coordinating attacks or harassment campaigns against community members ## 📋 Our Responsibilities ### Project Maintainers **Community Standards Enforcement:** - Monitor community interactions and maintain professional discussion standards - Address code of conduct violations promptly and fairly - Provide clear explanations for moderation decisions and consequences - Ensure consistent application of community standards across all platforms **Technical Leadership:** - Maintain project quality standards through code review and architectural guidance - Make final decisions on technical direction and feature priorities - Ensure security best practices and responsible disclosure handling - Coordinate release management and compatibility maintenance **Inclusive Community Building:** - Welcome new contributors and provide onboarding guidance - Facilitate constructive discussions and help resolve technical disagreements - Recognize and celebrate community contributions appropriately - Create opportunities for skill development and knowledge sharing **Transparency and Communication:** - Communicate project decisions and rationale clearly to the community - Provide regular updates on project status, roadmap, and priorities - Respond to community questions and concerns in a timely manner - Maintain open and accessible communication channels **Conflict Resolution:** - Address interpersonal conflicts with fairness and professionalism - Mediate technical disagreements and help find consensus solutions - Escalate serious violations to appropriate enforcement mechanisms - Document decisions and maintain consistent enforcement policies ### Community Members **Technical Contribution Quality:** - Follow established coding standards, testing requirements, and documentation guidelines - Participate in code review process constructively and responsively - Ensure contributions align with project goals and architectural principles - Test changes thoroughly and provide clear descriptions of functionality **Professional Communication:** - Communicate respectfully and professionally in all community interactions - Provide helpful feedback and ask clarifying questions when needed - Share knowledge and help others learn framework capabilities - Report technical issues with clear reproduction steps and relevant context **Community Participation:** - Read and follow project documentation, including contributing guidelines - Respect maintainer decisions and project direction while providing constructive input - Help newcomers learn the framework and contribute effectively - Participate in discussions with good faith and focus on technical merit **Responsible Behavior:** - Report code of conduct violations through appropriate channels - Respect intellectual property rights and licensing requirements - Maintain confidentiality of private information and security-sensitive details - Use community resources responsibly and avoid disruptive behavior **Continuous Learning:** - Stay updated on project changes, best practices, and security considerations - Seek feedback on contributions and incorporate suggestions for improvement - Share experiences and patterns that benefit the broader community - Contribute to documentation and educational resources when possible ## 🚨 Enforcement ### Reporting Issues **Reporting Channels:** **Primary Contact:** - **Email**: anton.knoery@gmail.com (monitored by conduct team) - **Response Time**: 48-72 hours for initial acknowledgment - **Confidentiality**: All reports treated with appropriate discretion **Alternative Channels:** - **GitHub Issues**: For public discussion of community standards and policies - **Direct Contact**: Individual maintainer contact for urgent situations - **Anonymous Reporting**: Anonymous form available for sensitive situations **What to Include in Reports:** - Clear description of the incident or behavior - Date, time, and location (platform/channel) where incident occurred - Names of individuals involved (if known and relevant) - Screenshots, links, or other evidence (if available) - Impact on you or the community - Previous related incidents (if applicable) **Reporting Template:** ``` **Incident Description:** [Clear summary of what occurred] **Date/Time/Location:** [When and where the incident took place] **Individuals Involved:** [Names or usernames of people involved] **Evidence:** [Links, screenshots, or other supporting information] **Impact:** [How this affected you or the community] **Additional Context:** [Any other relevant information or previous incidents] ``` **Support for Reporters:** - Guidance on documentation and evidence collection - Regular updates on investigation progress - Protection from retaliation or further harassment - Resources for additional support if needed ### Investigation Process **Investigation Process:** **Initial Response (24-48 hours):** - Acknowledge receipt of report to reporter - Review submitted evidence and documentation - Identify conduct team members for investigation (avoiding conflicts of interest) - Take immediate action if required to prevent ongoing harm **Investigation Phase (3-7 days):** - Gather additional information and evidence as needed - Interview relevant parties while maintaining confidentiality - Consult with other maintainers and conduct team members - Review similar past incidents for consistency in handling **Decision and Response (7-14 days from initial report):** - Determine whether code of conduct violation occurred - Decide on appropriate consequences based on severity and impact - Communicate decision to reporter and involved parties - Implement consequences and monitoring as appropriate **Timeline Extensions:** - Complex cases may require additional investigation time - Reporter notified of any delays with updated timeline - Urgent cases prioritized for faster resolution - External consultation may be sought for serious violations **Documentation and Follow-up:** - All incidents documented for pattern recognition and consistency - Follow-up communication to ensure resolution effectiveness - Policy updates if investigation reveals gaps or improvements needed - Community notification for serious violations affecting project safety **Confidentiality:** - Investigation details kept confidential to protect all parties - Information shared only with conduct team and relevant maintainers - Public disclosure only when necessary for community safety - Reporter identity protected unless they consent to disclosure ### Possible Consequences **Consequence Levels:** **Level 1: Education and Guidance** - **For**: Minor violations, first-time issues, misunderstandings - **Actions**: Private conversation, resource sharing, clarification of expectations - **Examples**: Inappropriate language, unclear communication, minor disruption - **Monitoring**: Informal follow-up to ensure improvement **Level 2: Formal Warning** - **For**: Repeated minor violations, moderate behavioral issues - **Actions**: Written warning, specific behavior changes required, defined monitoring period - **Examples**: Continued disrespectful communication, ignoring feedback, minor harassment - **Monitoring**: Structured check-ins and progress evaluation **Level 3: Temporary Restrictions** - **For**: Serious violations, repeated warnings ignored, significant disruption - **Actions**: Temporary ban from specific platforms, contribution restrictions, supervision required - **Duration**: 1-30 days depending on severity - **Examples**: Personal attacks, deliberate misinformation, persistent harassment **Level 4: Long-term Suspension** - **For**: Severe violations, pattern of harmful behavior, community impact - **Actions**: Extended ban from all community platforms and contribution activities - **Duration**: 3-12 months with defined rehabilitation requirements - **Examples**: Serious harassment, security violations, malicious code submission **Level 5: Permanent Ban** - **For**: Extreme violations, threats to community safety, legal violations - **Actions**: Permanent removal from all community spaces and activities - **No Appeals**: Reserved for the most serious violations only - **Examples**: Doxxing, threats of violence, serious legal violations, coordinated attacks **Appeals Process:** - Available for Levels 2-4 within 30 days of decision - Must include acknowledgment of behavior and improvement plan - Reviewed by different conduct team members than original decision - Appeals focus on process fairness and proportionality of consequences ## 🌍 Scope **GitHub Repositories:** - SuperClaude Framework main repository and all related repositories - Issues, pull requests, discussions, and code review interactions - Repository wikis, documentation, and project boards - Release notes, commit messages, and repository metadata **Communication Platforms:** - GitHub Discussions and Issues for project-related communication - Any official SuperClaude social media accounts or announcements - Community forums, chat channels, or messaging platforms - Video calls, meetings, or webinars related to the project **Events and Conferences:** - SuperClaude-sponsored events, meetups, or conference presentations - Community workshops, training sessions, or educational events - Online events, webinars, or live streams featuring SuperClaude - Informal gatherings or meetups organized by community members **External Platforms:** - Stack Overflow, Reddit, or other platforms when discussing SuperClaude - Social media interactions related to the project or community - Blog posts, articles, or publications about SuperClaude Framework - Professional networking platforms when representing the community **Private Communications:** - Direct messages between community members about project matters - Email communications related to project contributions or support - Private discussions about technical issues or collaboration - Mentorship relationships formed through community participation **Representation Guidelines:** When representing SuperClaude Framework in any capacity: - Professional behavior expected regardless of platform or context - Community standards apply even in informal settings - Consider impact on project reputation and community relationships - Seek guidance from maintainers when uncertain about representation ## 💬 Guidelines for Healthy Discussion **Technical Discussion Best Practices:** **Focus on Merit:** - Base arguments on technical evidence, user value, and project goals - Provide specific examples, benchmarks, or test results to support positions - Consider multiple perspectives and trade-offs in complex decisions - Acknowledge when you lack expertise and seek input from domain experts **Constructive Disagreement:** - Disagree with ideas and approaches, not individuals - Explain reasoning clearly and provide alternative solutions - Ask clarifying questions to understand different viewpoints - Find common ground and build consensus through collaboration **Knowledge Sharing:** - Share context and background for technical decisions - Explain concepts clearly for community members with different experience levels - Provide links to documentation, examples, or external resources - Contribute to collective understanding through detailed explanations **Decision Making:** - Respect maintainer authority for final technical decisions - Provide input early in the decision process rather than after implementation - Accept decisions gracefully while maintaining option for future discussion - Focus on implementation quality and user impact over personal preferences **Community Discussion Guidelines:** **Inclusive Participation:** - Welcome newcomers and provide context for ongoing discussions - Use clear language and avoid excessive jargon or insider references - Provide multiple ways to participate (writing, examples, testing, etc.) - Encourage diverse perspectives and experience sharing **Productive Conversations:** - Stay on topic and maintain focus on actionable outcomes - Break complex discussions into smaller, manageable topics - Summarize long discussions and highlight key decisions or next steps - Use threading and clear subject lines to organize related discussions ## 🎓 Educational Approach **Educational Philosophy:** SuperClaude Framework prioritizes education and growth over punishment when addressing community issues. We believe most conflicts arise from misunderstandings, different experience levels, or lack of context rather than malicious intent. **Learning-Focused Enforcement:** - First response focuses on education and clarification of expectations - Provide resources and examples for better community participation - Connect community members with mentors and learning opportunities - Emphasize skill development and professional growth through participation **Conflict Resolution Approach:** - Address underlying causes of conflicts rather than just symptoms - Facilitate direct communication between parties when appropriate - Provide mediation and guidance for technical and interpersonal disagreements - Focus on finding solutions that benefit the entire community **Progressive Development:** - Recognize that community participation skills develop over time - Provide scaffolding and support for newcomers learning professional communication - Create opportunities for community members to learn from mistakes - Celebrate growth and improvement in community participation **Restorative Practices:** - Encourage acknowledgment of harm and genuine efforts to make amends - Focus on rebuilding trust and relationships after conflicts - Provide pathways for community members to contribute positively after violations - Balance accountability with opportunities for redemption and growth **Community Learning:** - Use conflicts as learning opportunities for the entire community - Share lessons learned (while protecting individual privacy) - Update policies and practices based on community experience - Build collective wisdom about effective collaboration and communication ## 📞 Contact Information ### Conduct Team **Conduct Team:** - **Primary Contact**: anton.knoery@gmail.com - **Team Composition**: Selected maintainers and community members with training in conflict resolution - **Response Time**: 48-72 hours for initial acknowledgment - **Availability**: Monitored continuously with escalation procedures for urgent issues **Team Responsibilities:** - Review and investigate code of conduct violation reports - Provide guidance on community standards and policy interpretation - Mediate conflicts and facilitate resolution between community members - Recommend policy updates based on community needs and experiences **Expertise Areas:** - **Technical Guidance**: Code review standards, contribution quality, project architecture - **Community Building**: Inclusive participation, mentorship, conflict resolution - **Security**: Vulnerability reporting, responsible disclosure, safety protocols - **Legal Compliance**: Licensing, intellectual property, harassment prevention **Confidentiality and Impartiality:** - All conduct team members trained in confidential information handling - Recusal procedures for cases involving personal relationships or conflicts of interest - External consultation available for complex cases requiring specialized expertise - Regular training updates on best practices for community management **Contact Preferences:** - **Email**: anton.knoery@gmail.com for all formal reports and inquiries - **Anonymous**: Anonymous reporting form available for sensitive situations - **Urgent**: Emergency contact procedures for immediate safety concerns - **Follow-up**: Scheduled check-ins for ongoing cases and policy discussions ### Project Leadership **Project Leadership:** - **Maintainers**: @SuperClaude-Org maintainer team on GitHub - **Issues**: GitHub Issues with `conduct` or `community` labels for public policy discussions - **Email**: anton.knoery@gmail.com for general leadership questions **Leadership Responsibilities:** - **Policy Development**: Creating and updating community standards and enforcement procedures - **Strategic Direction**: Ensuring community policies align with project goals and values - **Resource Allocation**: Providing support and resources for community management - **Final Appeals**: Serving as final authority for serious enforcement decisions **Escalation Procedures:** - **Level 1**: Conduct team handles day-to-day community management - **Level 2**: Project maintainers involved for policy questions and serious violations - **Level 3**: Project leadership council for appeals and policy changes - **External**: Legal counsel or external mediation for extreme cases **Policy Questions:** - **Community Standards**: Interpretation of code of conduct and enforcement guidelines - **Inclusion Practices**: Guidance on inclusive participation and accessibility - **Technical Standards**: Integration of community standards with technical contribution requirements - **External Relations**: Representation of community standards in external partnerships **Public Communication:** - **Transparency**: Regular updates on community health and policy effectiveness - **Education**: Resources and training for community members and contributors - **Accountability**: Public reporting on enforcement actions and policy changes - **Feedback**: Open channels for community input on policies and procedures ## 🙏 Acknowledgments **Code of Conduct Sources:** This code of conduct draws inspiration from several established community standards and best practices: **Primary Sources:** - **Contributor Covenant**: Industry-standard framework for open source community standards - **Python Community Code of Conduct**: Emphasis on technical excellence and inclusive participation - **Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines**: Focus on healthy contribution and conflict resolution - **GitHub Community Guidelines**: Platform-specific behavior standards and enforcement practices **Professional Standards:** - **ACM Code of Ethics**: Professional computing and software development standards - **IEEE Code of Ethics**: Engineering ethics and professional responsibility - **Software Engineering Body of Knowledge**: Best practices for collaborative software development - **Open Source Initiative**: Community building and governance best practices **Academic Research:** - **Diversity and Inclusion in Open Source**: Research on effective inclusive community practices - **Conflict Resolution in Technical Communities**: Evidence-based approaches to technical disagreement - **Psychological Safety in Teams**: Creating environments for effective collaboration and learning - **Community of Practice Theory**: Building knowledge-sharing communities **Legal and Compliance:** - **Anti-Harassment Laws**: Applicable legal standards for workplace and community behavior - **International Human Rights Standards**: Universal principles for respectful interaction - **Platform Terms of Service**: Compliance with GitHub and other platform community standards - **Accessibility Guidelines**: Ensuring inclusive participation for diverse abilities and backgrounds ## 📚 Additional Resources **Community Building Resources:** **Inclusive Participation:** - [Mozilla's Inclusion and Diversity Guide](https://wiki.mozilla.org/Inclusion) - Practical strategies for inclusive communities - [GitHub's Open Source Guide](https://opensource.guide/) - Community building and maintenance - [CHAOSS Diversity & Inclusion Metrics](https://chaoss.community/) - Measuring community health and inclusion - [Turing Way Community Handbook](https://the-turing-way.netlify.app/) - Collaborative research community practices **Conflict Resolution:** - [Contributor Covenant Enforcement Guide](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/enforcement/) - Best practices for code of conduct enforcement - [Restorative Justice in Tech](https://www.restorativejusticefortech.com/) - Alternative approaches to community conflict - [Crucial Conversations](https://cruciallearning.com/) - Professional communication and difficult conversations - [Harvard Negotiation Project](https://www.pon.harvard.edu/) - Interest-based negotiation and conflict resolution **Bystander Intervention:** - **Recognize**: Identify when community standards are being violated or when someone needs support - **Assess**: Evaluate the situation and determine the most appropriate response - **Act**: Intervene directly, seek help from moderators, or provide support to affected parties - **Follow Up**: Check on involved parties and report incidents to appropriate authorities **Professional Development:** - [Software Engineering Ethics](https://ethics.acm.org/) - Professional standards for computing professionals - [IEEE Computer Society Code of Ethics](https://www.computer.org/code-of-ethics) - Technical professional standards - [Open Source Citizenship](https://github.com/opensourcecitizenship/opensourcecitizenship) - Responsible open source participation - [Tech Workers Coalition](https://techworkerscoalition.org/) - Collective action and professional responsibility **Educational Resources:** - [Unconscious Bias Training](https://www.google.com/search?q=unconscious+bias+training) - Understanding and addressing implicit bias - [Active Bystander Training](https://www.ihollaback.org/) - Intervention strategies for harassment and discrimination - [Psychological Safety](https://rework.withgoogle.com/guides/understanding-team-effectiveness/) - Creating safe environments for collaboration --- **Policy Maintenance:** **Last Updated**: December 2024 (SuperClaude Framework v4.0) **Next Review**: June 2025 (Semi-annual review cycle) **Version**: 4.1.5 (Updated for v4 community structure and governance) **Review Schedule:** - **Semi-Annual Reviews**: Policy effectiveness assessment and community feedback integration - **Incident-Based Updates**: Policy updates following significant enforcement actions or lessons learned - **Community-Driven Changes**: Updates based on community proposals and feedback - **Legal Compliance Updates**: Updates to maintain compliance with changing legal standards **Change Process:** - **Minor Updates**: Clarifications, contact updates, and resource additions - **Major Updates**: Substantial policy changes with community discussion and feedback period - **Emergency Updates**: Critical changes for community safety with immediate implementation - **Community Input**: Regular solicitation of feedback through surveys and open discussions **Community Acknowledgments:** SuperClaude Framework's inclusive and professional community culture benefits from the active participation of contributors who embody these values in their daily interactions and technical contributions. **Community Contributors:** - Community members who model professional communication and inclusive participation - Contributors who provide mentorship and support to newcomers and fellow developers - Individuals who report issues constructively and help maintain community standards - Advocates who promote the framework and community in external venues **Positive Impact Recognition:** - [GitHub Contributors](https://github.com/SuperClaude-Org/SuperClaude_Framework/graphs/contributors) - Technical and community contributions - Community discussions highlight helpful guidance, mentorship, and collaborative problem-solving - Regular appreciation for inclusive behavior and professional communication - Annual community recognition for outstanding contributions to community culture **Growing Community:** The SuperClaude community continues to grow through shared commitment to technical excellence, inclusive collaboration, and continuous learning. Community-focused contributions, from welcoming newcomers to facilitating productive discussions, strengthen the environment for all participants. **Join Our Community:** Whether you're contributing code, improving documentation, helping others learn, or participating in discussions, your commitment to professional and inclusive behavior helps build a better software development community for everyone. Every positive interaction contributes to our collective success and the advancement of AI-assisted development tools.