feat: Add comprehensive review command with quality analysis (#24)

* feat: Add comprehensive review command with quality analysis

- Add new /review command with --files, --commit, --pr flags
- Implement evidence-based quality assessment patterns
- Create comprehensive review patterns YAML resource
- Update command index to reflect 19 total commands
- Integrate with existing analysis workflow

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Pauer <kevinpauer@users.noreply.github.com>

* fix: remove new custom .yml and reuse existing ones; adjust compression-performance-patterns

* feat: add command documentation

---------

Signed-off-by: Kevin Pauer <kevinpauer@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Kevin Pauer <kevinpauer@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
kevinpauer
2025-06-26 15:31:35 +02:00
committed by GitHub
parent 3cb8217c34
commit 65915024a1
5 changed files with 121 additions and 9 deletions

View File

@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
@include shared/universal-constants.yml#Universal_Legend
## Ultra-Compressed Reference
Commands: `/cmd --flags` | 18 total | Universal flags available
Commands: `/cmd --flags` | 19 total | Universal flags available
@include shared/flag-inheritance.yml#Universal_Always
## Command Categories
**Analysis**: `/analyze` `/scan` `/explain`
**Analysis**: `/analyze` `/scan` `/explain` `/review`
**Build**: `/build` `/deploy` `/migrate`
**Manage**: `/task` `/load` `/cleanup`
**Dev**: `/test` `/troubleshoot` `/improve`
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Commands: `/cmd --flags` | 18 total | Universal flags available
## Commands w/ Primary Flags
**Dev**: `/build` --init|feature|react | `/dev-setup` --install|ci | `/test` --coverage|e2e
**Analysis**: `/analyze` --code|arch | `/troubleshoot` --fix|prod | `/improve` --perf|quality | `/explain` --depth
**Analysis**: `/analyze` --code|arch | `/review` --files|commit|pr | `/troubleshoot` --fix|prod | `/improve` --perf|quality | `/explain` --depth
**Ops**: `/deploy` --env|rollback | `/migrate` --dry-run | `/scan` --security | `/estimate` --detailed | `/cleanup` --all | `/git` --commit|sync
**Design**: `/design` --api|ddd | `/document` --api|user | `/spawn` --task
**Manage**: `/task` --create|status | `/load` --context
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Commands: `/cmd --flags` | 18 total | Universal flags available
**Setup**: `/load``/dev-setup --install``/build --init``/test`
**Feature**: `/analyze``/design --api``/build --tdd``/test --e2e``/deploy`
**Debug**: `/troubleshoot --fix``/test``/git --commit`
**Quality**: `/analyze --code --think``/improve --quality``/scan --validate`
**Quality**: `/review --quality --evidence``/improve --quality``/scan --validate`
**Security**: `/scan --security --owasp``/improve``/scan --validate`
### Advanced Flag Combinations

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
**Purpose**: AI-powered code review and quality analysis
---
@include shared/universal-constants.yml#Universal_Legend
## Command Execution
Execute: immediate. --plan→show plan first
Legend: Generated based on symbols used in command
Purpose: "[Action][Subject] in $ARGUMENTS"
Perform comprehensive code review and quality analysis on files, commits, or pull requests specified in $ARGUMENTS.
@include shared/flag-inheritance.yml#Universal_Always
Examples:
- `/review --files src/auth.ts --persona-security` - Security-focused file review
- `/review --commit HEAD --quality --evidence` - Quality review with sources
- `/review --pr 123 --all --interactive` - Comprehensive PR review
- `/review --files src/ --persona-performance --think` - Performance analysis
## Command-Specific Flags
--files: "Review specific files or directories"
--commit: "Review changes in specified commit (HEAD, hash, range)"
--pr: "Review pull request changes (git diff main..branch)"
--quality: "Focus on code quality issues (DRY, SOLID, complexity)"
--evidence: "Include sources and documentation for all suggestions"
--fix: "Suggest specific fixes for identified issues"
--summary: "Generate executive summary of review findings"
@include shared/quality-patterns.yml#Code_Quality_Metrics
@include shared/security-patterns.yml#OWASP_Top_10
@include shared/compression-performance-patterns.yml#Performance_Baselines
@include shared/architecture-patterns.yml#DDD_Building_Blocks
## Review Process & Methodology
**1. Context Analysis:** Understanding codebase patterns | Identifying architectural style | Recognizing team conventions | Establishing review scope
**2. Multi-Dimensional Scan:** Quality assessment across all dimensions | Persona-specific deep dives | Cross-reference analysis | Dependency impact review
**3. Evidence Collection:** Research best practices via Context7 | Cite authoritative sources | Reference documentation | Provide measurable metrics
**4. Prioritized Findings:** Critical issues first | Security vulnerabilities highlighted | Performance bottlenecks identified | Quality improvements suggested
**5. Actionable Recommendations:** Specific fix suggestions | Alternative approaches | Refactoring opportunities | Prevention strategies
**Evidence-Based Analysis:** All suggestions must cite authoritative sources | Reference official docs via Context7 | Cross-reference industry standards | Performance claims require measurable evidence
**Persona Specialization:** Security→Vulnerabilities+compliance | Performance→Bottlenecks+optimization | Architecture→Patterns+maintainability | QA→Coverage+validation
@include shared/research-patterns.yml#Mandatory_Research_Flows
@include shared/quality-patterns.yml#Validation_Sequence
## Persona Integration
**--persona-security:** Security-first analysis | Threat modeling | Vulnerability scanning | Compliance checking | Risk assessment
**--persona-performance:** Performance optimization focus | Bottleneck identification | Resource analysis | Scalability review
**--persona-architect:** System design evaluation | Pattern assessment | Maintainability review | Technical debt analysis
**--persona-qa:** Testing coverage analysis | Edge case identification | Quality metrics | Validation strategies
**--persona-refactorer:** Code improvement opportunities | Refactoring suggestions | Cleanup recommendations | Pattern application
@include shared/execution-patterns.yml#Servers
@include shared/docs-patterns.yml#Standard_Notifications
@include shared/universal-constants.yml#Standard_Messages_Templates

View File

@@ -121,6 +121,12 @@ Performance_Baselines:
CPU_Utilization: "Track intensive operations"
Network_Usage: "MCP server communication overhead"
Disk_I_O: "File operations efficiency"
Review_Scope_Limits:
Single_File: "Files >1000 lines flagged for review scope"
Directory: "Directories >50 files require batch processing"
Repository: "Repos >10K files get incremental analysis"
Large_File_Warning: "Files >5MB may require streaming analysis"
```
## MCP Performance Integration