mirror of
https://github.com/SuperClaude-Org/SuperClaude_Framework.git
synced 2025-12-29 16:16:08 +00:00
refactor(docs): move core docs into framework/business/research (move-only)
- framework/: principles, rules, flags (思想・行動規範) - business/: symbols, examples (ビジネス領域) - research/: config (調査設定) - All files renamed to lowercase for consistency
This commit is contained in:
kazuki
279
superclaude/business/examples.md
Normal file
279
superclaude/business/examples.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,279 @@
|
||||
# BUSINESS_PANEL_EXAMPLES.md - Usage Examples and Integration Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
## Basic Usage Examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 1: Strategic Plan Analysis
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @strategy_doc.pdf
|
||||
|
||||
# Output: Discussion mode with Porter, Collins, Meadows, Doumont
|
||||
# Analysis focuses on competitive positioning, organizational capability,
|
||||
# system dynamics, and communication clarity
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 2: Innovation Assessment
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/sc:business-panel "We're developing AI-powered customer service" --experts "christensen,drucker,godin"
|
||||
|
||||
# Output: Discussion mode focusing on jobs-to-be-done, customer value,
|
||||
# and remarkability/tribe building
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 3: Risk Analysis with Debate
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @risk_assessment.md --mode debate
|
||||
|
||||
# Output: Debate mode with Taleb challenging conventional risk assessments,
|
||||
# other experts defending their frameworks, systems perspective on conflicts
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Example 4: Strategic Learning Session
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/sc:business-panel "Help me understand competitive strategy" --mode socratic
|
||||
|
||||
# Output: Socratic mode with strategic questions from multiple frameworks,
|
||||
# progressive questioning based on user responses
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Advanced Usage Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
### Multi-Document Analysis
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @market_research.pdf @competitor_analysis.xlsx @financial_projections.csv --synthesis-only
|
||||
|
||||
# Comprehensive analysis across multiple documents with focus on synthesis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Domain-Specific Analysis
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @product_strategy.md --focus "innovation" --experts "christensen,drucker,meadows"
|
||||
|
||||
# Innovation-focused analysis with disruption theory, management principles, systems thinking
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Structured Communication Focus
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @exec_presentation.pptx --focus "communication" --structured
|
||||
|
||||
# Analysis focused on message clarity, audience needs, cognitive load optimization
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with SuperClaude Commands
|
||||
|
||||
### Combined with /analyze
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/analyze @business_model.md --business-panel
|
||||
|
||||
# Technical analysis followed by business expert panel review
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Combined with /improve
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/improve @strategy_doc.md --business-panel --iterative
|
||||
|
||||
# Iterative improvement with business expert validation
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Combined with /design
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/design business-model --business-panel --experts "drucker,porter,kim_mauborgne"
|
||||
|
||||
# Business model design with expert guidance
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Expert Selection Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
### By Business Domain
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
strategy_planning:
|
||||
experts: ['porter', 'kim_mauborgne', 'collins', 'meadows']
|
||||
rationale: "Competitive analysis, blue ocean opportunities, execution excellence, systems thinking"
|
||||
|
||||
innovation_management:
|
||||
experts: ['christensen', 'drucker', 'godin', 'meadows']
|
||||
rationale: "Disruption theory, systematic innovation, remarkability, systems approach"
|
||||
|
||||
organizational_development:
|
||||
experts: ['collins', 'drucker', 'meadows', 'doumont']
|
||||
rationale: "Excellence principles, management effectiveness, systems change, clear communication"
|
||||
|
||||
risk_management:
|
||||
experts: ['taleb', 'meadows', 'porter', 'collins']
|
||||
rationale: "Antifragility, systems resilience, competitive threats, disciplined execution"
|
||||
|
||||
market_entry:
|
||||
experts: ['porter', 'christensen', 'godin', 'kim_mauborgne']
|
||||
rationale: "Industry analysis, disruption potential, tribe building, blue ocean creation"
|
||||
|
||||
business_model_design:
|
||||
experts: ['christensen', 'drucker', 'kim_mauborgne', 'meadows']
|
||||
rationale: "Value creation, customer focus, value innovation, system dynamics"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### By Analysis Type
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
comprehensive_audit:
|
||||
experts: "all"
|
||||
mode: "discussion → debate → synthesis"
|
||||
|
||||
strategic_validation:
|
||||
experts: ['porter', 'collins', 'taleb']
|
||||
mode: "debate"
|
||||
|
||||
learning_facilitation:
|
||||
experts: ['drucker', 'meadows', 'doumont']
|
||||
mode: "socratic"
|
||||
|
||||
quick_assessment:
|
||||
experts: "auto-select-3"
|
||||
mode: "discussion"
|
||||
flags: "--synthesis-only"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Format Variations
|
||||
|
||||
### Executive Summary Format
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --structured --synthesis-only
|
||||
|
||||
# Output:
|
||||
## 🎯 Strategic Assessment
|
||||
**💰 Financial Impact**: [Key economic drivers]
|
||||
**🏆 Competitive Position**: [Advantage analysis]
|
||||
**📈 Growth Opportunities**: [Expansion potential]
|
||||
**⚠️ Risk Factors**: [Critical threats]
|
||||
**🧩 Synthesis**: [Integrated recommendation]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Framework-by-Framework Format
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --verbose
|
||||
|
||||
# Output:
|
||||
## 📚 CHRISTENSEN - Disruption Analysis
|
||||
[Detailed jobs-to-be-done and disruption assessment]
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 PORTER - Competitive Strategy
|
||||
[Five forces and value chain analysis]
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧩 Cross-Framework Synthesis
|
||||
[Integration and strategic implications]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Question-Driven Format
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --questions
|
||||
|
||||
# Output:
|
||||
## 🤔 Strategic Questions for Consideration
|
||||
**🔨 Innovation Questions** (Christensen):
|
||||
- What job is this being hired to do?
|
||||
|
||||
**⚔️ Competitive Questions** (Porter):
|
||||
- What are the sustainable advantages?
|
||||
|
||||
**🧭 Management Questions** (Drucker):
|
||||
- What should our business be?
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration Workflows
|
||||
|
||||
### Business Strategy Development
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
workflow_stages:
|
||||
stage_1: "/sc:business-panel @market_research.pdf --mode discussion"
|
||||
stage_2: "/sc:business-panel @competitive_analysis.md --mode debate"
|
||||
stage_3: "/sc:business-panel 'synthesize findings' --mode socratic"
|
||||
stage_4: "/design strategy --business-panel --experts 'porter,kim_mauborgne'"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Innovation Pipeline Assessment
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
workflow_stages:
|
||||
stage_1: "/sc:business-panel @innovation_portfolio.xlsx --focus innovation"
|
||||
stage_2: "/improve @product_roadmap.md --business-panel"
|
||||
stage_3: "/analyze @market_opportunities.pdf --business-panel --think"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Risk Management Review
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
workflow_stages:
|
||||
stage_1: "/sc:business-panel @risk_register.pdf --experts 'taleb,meadows,porter'"
|
||||
stage_2: "/sc:business-panel 'challenge risk assumptions' --mode debate"
|
||||
stage_3: "/implement risk_mitigation --business-panel --validate"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Customization Options
|
||||
|
||||
### Expert Behavior Modification
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Focus specific expert on particular aspect
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --christensen-focus "disruption-potential"
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --porter-focus "competitive-moats"
|
||||
|
||||
# Adjust expert interaction style
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --interaction "collaborative" # softer debate mode
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --interaction "challenging" # stronger debate mode
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Output Customization
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Symbol density control
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --symbols minimal # reduce symbol usage
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --symbols rich # full symbol system
|
||||
|
||||
# Analysis depth control
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --depth surface # high-level overview
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --depth detailed # comprehensive analysis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Time and Resource Management
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Quick analysis for time constraints
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --quick --experts-max 3
|
||||
|
||||
# Comprehensive analysis for important decisions
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --comprehensive --all-experts
|
||||
|
||||
# Resource-aware analysis
|
||||
/sc:business-panel @doc.pdf --budget 10000 # token limit
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Validation
|
||||
|
||||
### Analysis Quality Checks
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
authenticity_validation:
|
||||
voice_consistency: "Each expert maintains characteristic style"
|
||||
framework_fidelity: "Analysis follows authentic methodology"
|
||||
interaction_realism: "Expert dynamics reflect professional patterns"
|
||||
|
||||
business_relevance:
|
||||
strategic_focus: "Analysis addresses real strategic concerns"
|
||||
actionable_insights: "Recommendations are implementable"
|
||||
evidence_based: "Conclusions supported by framework logic"
|
||||
|
||||
integration_quality:
|
||||
synthesis_value: "Combined insights exceed individual analysis"
|
||||
framework_preservation: "Integration maintains framework distinctiveness"
|
||||
practical_utility: "Results support strategic decision-making"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Standards
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
response_time:
|
||||
simple_analysis: "< 30 seconds"
|
||||
comprehensive_analysis: "< 2 minutes"
|
||||
multi_document: "< 5 minutes"
|
||||
|
||||
token_efficiency:
|
||||
discussion_mode: "8-15K tokens"
|
||||
debate_mode: "10-20K tokens"
|
||||
socratic_mode: "12-25K tokens"
|
||||
synthesis_only: "3-8K tokens"
|
||||
|
||||
accuracy_targets:
|
||||
framework_authenticity: "> 90%"
|
||||
strategic_relevance: "> 85%"
|
||||
actionable_insights: "> 80%"
|
||||
```
|
||||
212
superclaude/business/symbols.md
Normal file
212
superclaude/business/symbols.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,212 @@
|
||||
# BUSINESS_SYMBOLS.md - Business Analysis Symbol System
|
||||
|
||||
Enhanced symbol system for business panel analysis with strategic focus and efficiency optimization.
|
||||
|
||||
## Business-Specific Symbols
|
||||
|
||||
### Strategic Analysis
|
||||
| Symbol | Meaning | Usage Context |
|
||||
|--------|---------|---------------|
|
||||
| 🎯 | strategic target, objective | Key goals and outcomes |
|
||||
| 📈 | growth opportunity, positive trend | Market growth, revenue increase |
|
||||
| 📉 | decline, risk, negative trend | Market decline, threats |
|
||||
| 💰 | financial impact, revenue | Economic drivers, profit centers |
|
||||
| ⚖️ | trade-offs, balance | Strategic decisions, resource allocation |
|
||||
| 🏆 | competitive advantage | Unique value propositions, strengths |
|
||||
| 🔄 | business cycle, feedback loop | Recurring patterns, system dynamics |
|
||||
| 🌊 | blue ocean, new market | Uncontested market space |
|
||||
| 🏭 | industry, market structure | Competitive landscape |
|
||||
| 🎪 | remarkable, purple cow | Standout products, viral potential |
|
||||
|
||||
### Framework Integration
|
||||
| Symbol | Expert | Framework Element |
|
||||
|--------|--------|-------------------|
|
||||
| 🔨 | Christensen | Jobs-to-be-Done |
|
||||
| ⚔️ | Porter | Five Forces |
|
||||
| 🎪 | Godin | Purple Cow/Remarkable |
|
||||
| 🌊 | Kim/Mauborgne | Blue Ocean |
|
||||
| 🚀 | Collins | Flywheel Effect |
|
||||
| 🛡️ | Taleb | Antifragile/Robustness |
|
||||
| 🕸️ | Meadows | System Structure |
|
||||
| 💬 | Doumont | Clear Communication |
|
||||
| 🧭 | Drucker | Management Fundamentals |
|
||||
|
||||
### Analysis Process
|
||||
| Symbol | Process Stage | Description |
|
||||
|--------|---------------|-------------|
|
||||
| 🔍 | investigation | Initial analysis and discovery |
|
||||
| 💡 | insight | Key realizations and breakthroughs |
|
||||
| 🤝 | consensus | Expert agreement areas |
|
||||
| ⚡ | tension | Productive disagreement |
|
||||
| 🎭 | debate | Adversarial analysis mode |
|
||||
| ❓ | socratic | Question-driven exploration |
|
||||
| 🧩 | synthesis | Cross-framework integration |
|
||||
| 📋 | conclusion | Final recommendations |
|
||||
|
||||
### Business Logic Flow
|
||||
| Symbol | Meaning | Business Context |
|
||||
|--------|---------|------------------|
|
||||
| → | causes, leads to | Market trends → opportunities |
|
||||
| ⇒ | strategic transformation | Current state ⇒ desired future |
|
||||
| ← | constraint, limitation | Resource limits ← budget |
|
||||
| ⇄ | mutual influence | Customer needs ⇄ product development |
|
||||
| ∴ | strategic conclusion | Market analysis ∴ go-to-market strategy |
|
||||
| ∵ | business rationale | Expand ∵ market opportunity |
|
||||
| ≡ | strategic equivalence | Strategy A ≡ Strategy B outcomes |
|
||||
| ≠ | competitive differentiation | Our approach ≠ competitors |
|
||||
|
||||
## Expert Voice Symbols
|
||||
|
||||
### Communication Styles
|
||||
| Expert | Symbol | Voice Characteristic |
|
||||
|--------|--------|---------------------|
|
||||
| Christensen | 📚 | Academic, methodical |
|
||||
| Porter | 📊 | Analytical, data-driven |
|
||||
| Drucker | 🧠 | Wise, fundamental |
|
||||
| Godin | 💬 | Conversational, provocative |
|
||||
| Kim/Mauborgne | 🎨 | Strategic, value-focused |
|
||||
| Collins | 📖 | Research-driven, disciplined |
|
||||
| Taleb | 🎲 | Contrarian, risk-aware |
|
||||
| Meadows | 🌐 | Holistic, systems-focused |
|
||||
| Doumont | ✏️ | Precise, clarity-focused |
|
||||
|
||||
## Synthesis Output Templates
|
||||
|
||||
### Discussion Mode Synthesis
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 🧩 SYNTHESIS ACROSS FRAMEWORKS
|
||||
|
||||
**🤝 Convergent Insights**: [Where multiple experts agree]
|
||||
- 🎯 Strategic alignment on [key area]
|
||||
- 💰 Economic consensus around [financial drivers]
|
||||
- 🏆 Shared view of competitive advantage
|
||||
|
||||
**⚖️ Productive Tensions**: [Strategic trade-offs revealed]
|
||||
- 📈 Growth vs 🛡️ Risk management (Taleb ⚡ Collins)
|
||||
- 🌊 Innovation vs 📊 Market positioning (Kim/Mauborgne ⚡ Porter)
|
||||
|
||||
**🕸️ System Patterns** (Meadows analysis):
|
||||
- Leverage points: [key intervention opportunities]
|
||||
- Feedback loops: [reinforcing/balancing dynamics]
|
||||
|
||||
**💬 Communication Clarity** (Doumont optimization):
|
||||
- Core message: [essential strategic insight]
|
||||
- Action priorities: [implementation sequence]
|
||||
|
||||
**⚠️ Blind Spots**: [Gaps requiring additional analysis]
|
||||
|
||||
**🤔 Strategic Questions**: [Next exploration priorities]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Debate Mode Synthesis
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## ⚡ PRODUCTIVE TENSIONS RESOLVED
|
||||
|
||||
**Initial Conflict**: [Primary disagreement area]
|
||||
- 📚 **CHRISTENSEN position**: [Innovation framework perspective]
|
||||
- 📊 **PORTER counter**: [Competitive strategy challenge]
|
||||
|
||||
**🔄 Resolution Process**:
|
||||
[How experts found common ground or maintained productive tension]
|
||||
|
||||
**🧩 Higher-Order Solution**:
|
||||
[Strategy that honors multiple frameworks]
|
||||
|
||||
**🕸️ Systems Insight** (Meadows):
|
||||
[How the debate reveals deeper system dynamics]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Socratic Mode Synthesis
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## 🎓 STRATEGIC THINKING DEVELOPMENT
|
||||
|
||||
**🤔 Question Themes Explored**:
|
||||
- Framework lens: [Which expert frameworks were applied]
|
||||
- Strategic depth: [Level of analysis achieved]
|
||||
|
||||
**💡 Learning Insights**:
|
||||
- Pattern recognition: [Strategic thinking patterns developed]
|
||||
- Framework integration: [How to combine expert perspectives]
|
||||
|
||||
**🧭 Next Development Areas**:
|
||||
[Strategic thinking capabilities to develop further]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Token Efficiency Integration
|
||||
|
||||
### Compression Strategies
|
||||
- **Expert Voice Compression**: Maintain authenticity while reducing verbosity
|
||||
- **Framework Symbol Substitution**: Use symbols for common framework concepts
|
||||
- **Structured Output**: Organized templates reducing repetitive text
|
||||
- **Smart Abbreviation**: Business-specific abbreviations with context preservation
|
||||
|
||||
### Business Abbreviations
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
common_terms:
|
||||
'comp advantage': 'competitive advantage'
|
||||
'value prop': 'value proposition'
|
||||
'go-to-market': 'GTM'
|
||||
'total addressable market': 'TAM'
|
||||
'customer acquisition cost': 'CAC'
|
||||
'lifetime value': 'LTV'
|
||||
'key performance indicator': 'KPI'
|
||||
'return on investment': 'ROI'
|
||||
'minimum viable product': 'MVP'
|
||||
'product-market fit': 'PMF'
|
||||
|
||||
frameworks:
|
||||
'jobs-to-be-done': 'JTBD'
|
||||
'blue ocean strategy': 'BOS'
|
||||
'good to great': 'G2G'
|
||||
'five forces': '5F'
|
||||
'value chain': 'VC'
|
||||
'four actions framework': 'ERRC'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Mode Configuration
|
||||
|
||||
### Default Settings
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
business_panel_config:
|
||||
# Expert Selection
|
||||
max_experts: 5
|
||||
min_experts: 3
|
||||
auto_select: true
|
||||
diversity_optimization: true
|
||||
|
||||
# Analysis Depth
|
||||
phase_progression: adaptive
|
||||
synthesis_required: true
|
||||
cross_framework_validation: true
|
||||
|
||||
# Output Control
|
||||
symbol_compression: true
|
||||
structured_templates: true
|
||||
expert_voice_preservation: 0.85
|
||||
|
||||
# Integration
|
||||
mcp_sequential_primary: true
|
||||
mcp_context7_patterns: true
|
||||
persona_coordination: true
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Optimization
|
||||
- **Token Budget**: 15-30K tokens for comprehensive analysis
|
||||
- **Expert Caching**: Store expert personas for session reuse
|
||||
- **Framework Reuse**: Cache framework applications for similar content
|
||||
- **Synthesis Templates**: Pre-structured output formats for efficiency
|
||||
- **Parallel Analysis**: Where possible, run expert analysis in parallel
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Assurance
|
||||
|
||||
### Authenticity Validation
|
||||
- **Voice Consistency**: Each expert maintains characteristic communication style
|
||||
- **Framework Fidelity**: Analysis follows authentic framework methodology
|
||||
- **Interaction Realism**: Expert interactions reflect realistic professional dynamics
|
||||
- **Synthesis Integrity**: Combined insights maintain individual framework value
|
||||
|
||||
### Business Analysis Standards
|
||||
- **Strategic Relevance**: Analysis addresses real business strategic concerns
|
||||
- **Implementation Feasibility**: Recommendations are actionable and realistic
|
||||
- **Evidence Base**: Conclusions supported by framework logic and business evidence
|
||||
- **Professional Quality**: Analysis meets executive-level business communication standards
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user