2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
# SuperClaude Commands Guide
2025-09-21 04:54:42 +03:00
SuperClaude provides 25 commands for Claude Code: `/sc:*` commands for workflows and `@agent-*` for specialists.
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
## Command Types
| Type | Where Used | Format | Example |
|------|------------|--------|---------|
| **Slash Commands** | Claude Code | `/sc:[command]` | `/sc:implement "feature"` |
2025-08-21 19:05:51 +02:00
| **Agents** | Claude Code | `@agent-[name]` | `@agent-security "review"` |
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
| **Installation** | Terminal | `SuperClaude [command]` | `SuperClaude install` |
## Quick Test
```bash
# Terminal: Verify installation
python3 -m SuperClaude --version
2025-08-22 19:18:44 +02:00
# Claude Code CLI verification: claude --version
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
# Claude Code: Test commands
/sc:brainstorm "test project" # Should ask discovery questions
/sc:analyze README.md # Should provide analysis
```
**Workflow**: `/sc:brainstorm "idea"` → `/sc:implement "feature"` → `/sc:test`
## 🎯 Understanding SuperClaude Commands
## How SuperClaude Works
SuperClaude provides behavioral context files that Claude Code reads to adopt specialized behaviors. When you type `/sc:implement` , Claude Code reads the `implement.md` context file and follows its behavioral instructions.
**SuperClaude commands are NOT executed by software** - they are context triggers that modify Claude Code's behavior through reading specialized instruction files from the framework.
### Command Types:
- **Slash Commands** (`/sc:*` ): Trigger workflow patterns and behavioral modes
2025-08-21 19:05:51 +02:00
- **Agent Invocations** (`@agent-*` ): Manually activate specific domain specialists
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
- **Flags** (`--think` , `--safe-mode` ): Modify command behavior and depth
### The Context Mechanism:
1. **User Input** : You type `/sc:implement "auth system"`
2. **Context Loading** : Claude Code reads `~/.claude/SuperClaude/Commands/implement.md`
3. **Behavior Adoption** : Claude applies domain expertise, tool selection, and validation patterns
4. **Enhanced Output** : Structured implementation with security considerations and best practices
**Key Point**: This creates sophisticated development workflows through context management rather than traditional software execution.
### Installation vs Usage Commands
**🖥️ Terminal Commands** (Actual CLI software):
- `SuperClaude install` - Installs the framework components
- `SuperClaude update` - Updates existing installation
- `SuperClaude uninstall` - Removes framework installation
- `python3 -m SuperClaude --version` - Check installation status
**💬 Claude Code Commands** (Context triggers):
- `/sc:brainstorm` - Activates requirements discovery context
- `/sc:implement` - Activates feature development context
2025-08-21 19:05:51 +02:00
- `@agent-security` - Activates security specialist context
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
- All commands work inside Claude Code chat interface only
2025-08-18 12:45:06 +02:00
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
> **Quick Start**: Try `/sc:brainstorm "your project idea"` → `/sc:implement "feature name"` → `/sc:test` to experience the core workflow.
## 🧪 Testing Your Setup
2025-08-18 12:45:06 +02:00
### 🖥️ Terminal Verification (Run in Terminal/CMD)
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
```bash
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
# Verify SuperClaude is working (primary method)
python3 -m SuperClaude --version
2025-09-26 19:37:34 +05:30
# Example output: SuperClaude 4.1.5
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
2025-08-22 19:18:44 +02:00
# Claude Code CLI version check
claude --version
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-22 19:18:44 +02:00
# Check installed components
python3 -m SuperClaude install --list-components | grep mcp
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
# Example output: Shows installed MCP components
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
```
2025-08-18 12:45:06 +02:00
### 💬 Claude Code Testing (Type in Claude Code Chat)
```
# Test basic /sc: command
/sc:brainstorm "test project"
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
# Example behavior: Interactive requirements discovery starts
2025-08-18 12:45:06 +02:00
# Test command help
/sc:help
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
# Example behavior: List of available commands
2025-08-18 12:45:06 +02:00
```
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
**If tests fail**: Check [Installation Guide ](../Getting-Started/installation.md ) or [Troubleshooting ](#troubleshooting )
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
### 📝 Command Quick Reference
2025-08-18 12:45:06 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
| Command Type | Where to Run | Format | Purpose | Example |
|-------------|--------------|--------|---------|----------|
| ** 🖥️ Installation** | Terminal/CMD | `SuperClaude [command]` | Setup and maintenance | `SuperClaude install` |
| ** 🔧 Configuration** | Terminal/CMD | `python3 -m SuperClaude [command]` | Advanced configuration | `python3 -m SuperClaude --version` |
| ** 💬 Slash Commands** | Claude Code | `/sc:[command]` | Workflow automation | `/sc:implement "feature"` |
2025-08-21 19:05:51 +02:00
| ** 🤖 Agent Invocation** | Claude Code | `@agent-[name]` | Manual specialist activation | `@agent-security "review"` |
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
| ** ⚡ Enhanced Flags** | Claude Code | `/sc:[command] --flags` | Behavior modification | `/sc:analyze --think-hard` |
2025-08-18 12:45:06 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:05:51 +02:00
> **Remember**: All `/sc:` commands and `@agent-` invocations work inside Claude Code chat, not your terminal. They trigger Claude Code to read specific context files from the SuperClaude framework.
2025-08-18 12:45:06 +02:00
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
## Table of Contents
- [Essential Commands ](#essential-commands ) - Start here (8 core commands)
- [Common Workflows ](#common-workflows ) - Command combinations that work
2025-09-21 04:54:42 +03:00
- [Full Command Reference ](#full-command-reference ) - All 25 commands organized by category
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
- [Troubleshooting ](#troubleshooting ) - Common issues and solutions
- [Command Index ](#command-index ) - Find commands by category
---
## Essential Commands
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Core workflow commands for immediate productivity:**
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### `/sc:brainstorm` - Project Discovery
**Purpose**: Interactive requirements discovery and project planning
**Syntax**: `/sc:brainstorm "your idea"` `[--strategy systematic|creative]`
**Use Cases**:
- New project planning: `/sc:brainstorm "e-commerce platform"`
- Feature exploration: `/sc:brainstorm "user authentication system"`
- Problem solving: `/sc:brainstorm "slow database queries"`
2025-09-15 15:03:33 +00:00
### `/sc:help` - Command Reference
**Purpose**: Displays a list of all available `/sc` commands and their descriptions.
**Syntax**: `/sc:help`
**Use Cases**:
- Discovering available commands: `/sc:help`
- Getting a quick reminder of command names: `/sc:help`
2025-09-21 04:54:42 +03:00
### `/sc:research` - Deep Research Command
**Purpose**: Comprehensive web research with adaptive planning and intelligent search
**Syntax**: `/sc:research "[query]"` `[--depth quick|standard|deep|exhaustive] [--strategy planning|intent|unified]`
**Use Cases**:
- Technical research: `/sc:research "latest React 19 features" --depth deep`
- Market analysis: `/sc:research "AI coding assistant landscape 2024" --strategy unified`
- Academic investigation: `/sc:research "quantum computing breakthroughs" --depth exhaustive`
- Current events: `/sc:research "latest AI developments 2024"`
**Key Capabilities**:
- **6-Phase Workflow**: Understand → Plan → TodoWrite → Execute → Track → Validate
- **Adaptive Depth**: Quick (basic search), Standard (extended), Deep (comprehensive), Exhaustive (maximum depth)
- **Planning Strategies**: Planning (direct), Intent (clarify first), Unified (collaborative)
- **Parallel Execution**: Default parallel searches and extractions
- **Evidence Management**: Clear citations with relevance scoring
- **Output Standards**: Reports saved to `claudedocs/research_[topic]_[timestamp].md`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### `/sc:implement` - Feature Development
**Purpose**: Full-stack feature implementation with intelligent specialist routing
**Syntax**: `/sc:implement "feature description"` `[--type frontend|backend|fullstack] [--focus security|performance]`
**Use Cases**:
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
- Authentication: `/sc:implement "JWT login system"`
- UI components: `/sc:implement "responsive dashboard"`
- APIs: `/sc:implement "REST user endpoints"`
- Database: `/sc:implement "user schema with relationships"`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### `/sc:analyze` - Code Assessment
**Purpose**: Comprehensive code analysis across quality, security, and performance
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Syntax**: `/sc:analyze [path]` `[--focus quality|security|performance|architecture]`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Use Cases**:
- Project health: `/sc:analyze .`
- Security audit: `/sc:analyze --focus security`
- Performance review: `/sc:analyze --focus performance`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
feat: Add comprehensive business panel analysis system (#323)
* feat: Add comprehensive business panel analysis system
Implements /sc:business-panel command with 9 expert personas (Christensen, Porter, Drucker, Godin, Kim/Mauborgne, Collins, Taleb, Meadows, Doumont), three-phase adaptive methodology (Discussion/Debate/Socratic), intelligent mode selection, and cross-framework synthesis with business-specific symbol system.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: sarosh.quraishi@gmail.com
* docs: Update README and commands guide for business panel feature
- Update command count from 21 to 22 across all documentation
- Add Business Panel to behavioral modes (5 → 6 modes)
- Add /sc:business-panel to commands guide with full documentation
- Include expert panel details and usage examples
- Update command index and complexity classification
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: sarosh.quraishi@gmail.com
2025-08-29 14:25:34 +02:00
### `/sc:business-panel` - Strategic Business Analysis
**Purpose**: Multi-expert business strategy analysis with 9 renowned thought leaders
**Syntax**: `/sc:business-panel "content"` `[--mode discussion|debate|socratic] [--experts "name1,name2"]`
**Use Cases**:
- Strategy evaluation: `/sc:business-panel "our go-to-market strategy"`
- Competitive analysis: `/sc:business-panel @competitor_analysis.pdf --mode debate`
- Innovation assessment: `/sc:business-panel "AI product idea" --experts "christensen,drucker"`
- Strategic learning: `/sc:business-panel "competitive strategy" --mode socratic`
**Expert Panel**: Christensen, Porter, Drucker, Godin, Kim/Mauborgne, Collins, Taleb, Meadows, Doumont
added spec-panel, which transforms the project specs though the lens … (#346)
Introduces a multi-expert specification review and improvement system
powered by renowned software engineering and specification experts. This
command transforms technical specifications through the lens of industry
experts, providing actionable feedback and systematic improvement
recommendations.
🎯 Key Features
Expert Panel System
- 10 Industry Experts: Karl Wiegers, Gojko Adzic, Alistair Cockburn,
Martin Fowler, Michael Nygard, Sam Newman, Gregor Hohpe, Lisa Crispin,
Janet Gregory, and Kelsey Hightower
- Domain Specialization: Requirements engineering, architecture,
testing,
compliance, and cloud-native patterns
- Authentic Methodologies: Each expert applies their real-world
frameworks and critique styles
Analysis Modes
- Discussion Mode: Collaborative improvement through expert dialogue
- Critique Mode: Systematic review with prioritized recommendations
- Socratic Mode: Learning-focused questioning for deeper understanding
Focus Areas
- Requirements: Clarity, completeness, testability validation
- Architecture: Interface design, scalability, maintainability analysis
- Testing: Quality attributes, coverage, edge case identification
- Compliance: Regulatory requirements, security, operational excellence
🔧 Technical Implementation
Command Structure
/sc:spec-panel [content|@file] [--mode discussion|critique|socratic]
[--focus area] [--iterations N]
MCP Integration
- Sequential MCP: Expert panel coordination and structured analysis
- Context7 MCP: Industry patterns and best practices
- Persona System: Technical Writer, System Architect, Quality Engineer
activation
Quality Metrics
- Clarity Score (0-10): Language precision and understandability
- Completeness Score (0-10): Coverage of essential elements
- Testability Score (0-10): Measurability and validation capability
- Consistency Score (0-10): Internal coherence assessment
📊 Output Examples
Expert Critique Format
KARL WIEGERS - Requirements Engineering:
❌ CRITICAL: Password complexity requirements not specified
📝 RECOMMENDATION: Add requirement "System SHALL enforce password
complexity: minimum 8 characters, mixed case, numbers"
🎯 PRIORITY: High - Security vulnerability without standards
📊 QUALITY IMPACT: +35% security compliance, +20% completeness
Improvement Roadmap
- Immediate: Critical security and clarity issues
- Short-term: Architecture refinements and testing strategies
- Long-term: Evolution planning and advanced optimizations
🚀 Integration Patterns
Workflow
1. Generate specification using
https://github.com/github/spec-kit/blob/main/spec-driven.md
2. Review and improve with expert panel
3. Iterative refinement based on feedback
CI/CD Integration
- Specification validation in development workflow
- Quality gate enforcement with automated checks
- Version control integration for evolution tracking
📈 Quality Impact
Based on an example review:
- Security Completeness: +35% improvement
- Requirements Clarity: +14% improvement
- Testability Score: +19% improvement
- Production Readiness: +47% improvement
- Overall Quality: +24% improvement
🎓 Learning Features
Educational Value
- Socratic questioning mode for skill development
- Expert methodology exposure and learning
- Progressive specification writing guidance
- Best practice pattern recognition
Mentoring Integration
- Step-by-step improvement guidance
- Industry standard alignment
- Professional specification writing techniques
🔗 Files Changed
- SuperClaude/Commands/spec-panel.md - Complete command specification
🧪 Testing
Includes comprehensive examples:
- API specification review with security focus
- Requirements workshop with collaborative analysis
- Architecture validation with socratic questioning
- Multi-iteration improvement workflows
This feature significantly enhances SuperClaude's specification analysis
capabilities, providing professional-grade review and improvement
guidance through authentic expert perspectives and proven methodologies.
2025-09-09 17:01:56 +02:00
### `/sc:spec-panel` - Expert Specification Review
**Purpose**: Multi-expert specification review and improvement using renowned specification and software engineering experts
**Syntax**: `/sc:spec-panel [content|@file]` `[--mode discussion|critique|socratic] [--focus requirements|architecture|testing|compliance]`
**Use Cases**:
- Specification review: `/sc:spec-panel @api_spec.yml --mode critique --focus requirements,architecture`
- Requirements workshop: `/sc:spec-panel "user story content" --mode discussion`
- Architecture validation: `/sc:spec-panel @microservice.spec.yml --mode socratic --focus architecture`
- Compliance review: `/sc:spec-panel @security_requirements.yml --focus compliance`
- Iterative improvement: `/sc:spec-panel @complex_system.spec.yml --iterations 3`
**Expert Panel**: Wiegers, Adzic, Cockburn, Fowler, Nygard, Newman, Hohpe, Crispin, Gregory, Hightower
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### `/sc:troubleshoot` - Problem Diagnosis
**Purpose**: Systematic issue diagnosis with root cause analysis
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Syntax**: `/sc:troubleshoot "issue description"` `[--type build|runtime|performance]`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Use Cases**:
- Runtime errors: `/sc:troubleshoot "500 error on login"`
- Build failures: `/sc:troubleshoot --type build`
- Performance problems: `/sc:troubleshoot "slow page load"`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### `/sc:test` - Quality Assurance
**Purpose**: Comprehensive testing with coverage analysis
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Syntax**: `/sc:test` `[--type unit|integration|e2e] [--coverage] [--fix]`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Use Cases**:
- Full test suite: `/sc:test --coverage`
- Unit testing: `/sc:test --type unit --watch`
- E2E validation: `/sc:test --type e2e`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### `/sc:improve` - Code Enhancement
**Purpose**: Apply systematic code improvements and optimizations
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Syntax**: `/sc:improve [path]` `[--type performance|quality|security] [--preview]`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Use Cases**:
- General improvements: `/sc:improve src/`
- Performance optimization: `/sc:improve --type performance`
- Security hardening: `/sc:improve --type security`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### `/sc:document` - Documentation Generation
**Purpose**: Generate comprehensive documentation for code and APIs
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Syntax**: `/sc:document [path]` `[--type api|user-guide|technical] [--format markdown|html]`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Use Cases**:
- API docs: `/sc:document --type api`
- User guides: `/sc:document --type user-guide`
- Technical docs: `/sc:document --type technical`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### `/sc:workflow` - Implementation Planning
**Purpose**: Generate structured implementation plans from requirements
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Syntax**: `/sc:workflow "feature description"` `[--strategy agile|waterfall] [--format markdown]`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Use Cases**:
- Feature planning: `/sc:workflow "user authentication"`
- Sprint planning: `/sc:workflow --strategy agile`
- Architecture planning: `/sc:workflow "microservices migration"`
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
---
## Common Workflows
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Proven command combinations:**
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### New Project Setup
```bash
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
/sc:brainstorm "project concept" # Define requirements
/sc:design "system architecture" # Create technical design
/sc:workflow "implementation plan" # Generate development roadmap
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
```
### Feature Development
```bash
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
/sc:implement "feature name" # Build the feature
/sc:test --coverage # Validate with tests
/sc:document --type api # Generate documentation
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
```
### Code Quality Improvement
```bash
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
/sc:analyze --focus quality # Assess current state
/sc:improve --preview # Preview improvements
/sc:test --coverage # Validate changes
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
```
### Bug Investigation
```bash
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
/sc:troubleshoot "issue description" # Diagnose the problem
/sc:analyze --focus problem-area # Deep analysis
/sc:improve --fix --safe-mode # Apply targeted fixes
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
```
added spec-panel, which transforms the project specs though the lens … (#346)
Introduces a multi-expert specification review and improvement system
powered by renowned software engineering and specification experts. This
command transforms technical specifications through the lens of industry
experts, providing actionable feedback and systematic improvement
recommendations.
🎯 Key Features
Expert Panel System
- 10 Industry Experts: Karl Wiegers, Gojko Adzic, Alistair Cockburn,
Martin Fowler, Michael Nygard, Sam Newman, Gregor Hohpe, Lisa Crispin,
Janet Gregory, and Kelsey Hightower
- Domain Specialization: Requirements engineering, architecture,
testing,
compliance, and cloud-native patterns
- Authentic Methodologies: Each expert applies their real-world
frameworks and critique styles
Analysis Modes
- Discussion Mode: Collaborative improvement through expert dialogue
- Critique Mode: Systematic review with prioritized recommendations
- Socratic Mode: Learning-focused questioning for deeper understanding
Focus Areas
- Requirements: Clarity, completeness, testability validation
- Architecture: Interface design, scalability, maintainability analysis
- Testing: Quality attributes, coverage, edge case identification
- Compliance: Regulatory requirements, security, operational excellence
🔧 Technical Implementation
Command Structure
/sc:spec-panel [content|@file] [--mode discussion|critique|socratic]
[--focus area] [--iterations N]
MCP Integration
- Sequential MCP: Expert panel coordination and structured analysis
- Context7 MCP: Industry patterns and best practices
- Persona System: Technical Writer, System Architect, Quality Engineer
activation
Quality Metrics
- Clarity Score (0-10): Language precision and understandability
- Completeness Score (0-10): Coverage of essential elements
- Testability Score (0-10): Measurability and validation capability
- Consistency Score (0-10): Internal coherence assessment
📊 Output Examples
Expert Critique Format
KARL WIEGERS - Requirements Engineering:
❌ CRITICAL: Password complexity requirements not specified
📝 RECOMMENDATION: Add requirement "System SHALL enforce password
complexity: minimum 8 characters, mixed case, numbers"
🎯 PRIORITY: High - Security vulnerability without standards
📊 QUALITY IMPACT: +35% security compliance, +20% completeness
Improvement Roadmap
- Immediate: Critical security and clarity issues
- Short-term: Architecture refinements and testing strategies
- Long-term: Evolution planning and advanced optimizations
🚀 Integration Patterns
Workflow
1. Generate specification using
https://github.com/github/spec-kit/blob/main/spec-driven.md
2. Review and improve with expert panel
3. Iterative refinement based on feedback
CI/CD Integration
- Specification validation in development workflow
- Quality gate enforcement with automated checks
- Version control integration for evolution tracking
📈 Quality Impact
Based on an example review:
- Security Completeness: +35% improvement
- Requirements Clarity: +14% improvement
- Testability Score: +19% improvement
- Production Readiness: +47% improvement
- Overall Quality: +24% improvement
🎓 Learning Features
Educational Value
- Socratic questioning mode for skill development
- Expert methodology exposure and learning
- Progressive specification writing guidance
- Best practice pattern recognition
Mentoring Integration
- Step-by-step improvement guidance
- Industry standard alignment
- Professional specification writing techniques
🔗 Files Changed
- SuperClaude/Commands/spec-panel.md - Complete command specification
🧪 Testing
Includes comprehensive examples:
- API specification review with security focus
- Requirements workshop with collaborative analysis
- Architecture validation with socratic questioning
- Multi-iteration improvement workflows
This feature significantly enhances SuperClaude's specification analysis
capabilities, providing professional-grade review and improvement
guidance through authentic expert perspectives and proven methodologies.
2025-09-09 17:01:56 +02:00
### Specification Development
```bash
/sc:spec-panel @existing_spec .yml --mode critique # Expert review
/sc:spec-panel @improved_spec .yml --iterations 2 # Iterative refinement
/sc:document --type technical # Generate documentation
```
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
## Full Command Reference
### Development Commands
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
| Command | Purpose | Best For |
|---------|---------|----------|
| **workflow** | Implementation planning | Project roadmaps, sprint planning |
| **implement** | Feature development | Full-stack features, API development |
| **build** | Project compilation | CI/CD, production builds |
| **design** | System architecture | API specs, database schemas |
### Analysis Commands
| Command | Purpose | Best For |
|---------|---------|----------|
| **analyze** | Code assessment | Quality audits, security reviews |
2025-09-21 04:54:42 +03:00
| **research** | Web research with intelligent search | Technical research, current events, market analysis |
feat: Add comprehensive business panel analysis system (#323)
* feat: Add comprehensive business panel analysis system
Implements /sc:business-panel command with 9 expert personas (Christensen, Porter, Drucker, Godin, Kim/Mauborgne, Collins, Taleb, Meadows, Doumont), three-phase adaptive methodology (Discussion/Debate/Socratic), intelligent mode selection, and cross-framework synthesis with business-specific symbol system.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: sarosh.quraishi@gmail.com
* docs: Update README and commands guide for business panel feature
- Update command count from 21 to 22 across all documentation
- Add Business Panel to behavioral modes (5 → 6 modes)
- Add /sc:business-panel to commands guide with full documentation
- Include expert panel details and usage examples
- Update command index and complexity classification
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)
Co-Authored-By: sarosh.quraishi@gmail.com
2025-08-29 14:25:34 +02:00
| **business-panel** | Strategic analysis | Business decisions, competitive assessment |
added spec-panel, which transforms the project specs though the lens … (#346)
Introduces a multi-expert specification review and improvement system
powered by renowned software engineering and specification experts. This
command transforms technical specifications through the lens of industry
experts, providing actionable feedback and systematic improvement
recommendations.
🎯 Key Features
Expert Panel System
- 10 Industry Experts: Karl Wiegers, Gojko Adzic, Alistair Cockburn,
Martin Fowler, Michael Nygard, Sam Newman, Gregor Hohpe, Lisa Crispin,
Janet Gregory, and Kelsey Hightower
- Domain Specialization: Requirements engineering, architecture,
testing,
compliance, and cloud-native patterns
- Authentic Methodologies: Each expert applies their real-world
frameworks and critique styles
Analysis Modes
- Discussion Mode: Collaborative improvement through expert dialogue
- Critique Mode: Systematic review with prioritized recommendations
- Socratic Mode: Learning-focused questioning for deeper understanding
Focus Areas
- Requirements: Clarity, completeness, testability validation
- Architecture: Interface design, scalability, maintainability analysis
- Testing: Quality attributes, coverage, edge case identification
- Compliance: Regulatory requirements, security, operational excellence
🔧 Technical Implementation
Command Structure
/sc:spec-panel [content|@file] [--mode discussion|critique|socratic]
[--focus area] [--iterations N]
MCP Integration
- Sequential MCP: Expert panel coordination and structured analysis
- Context7 MCP: Industry patterns and best practices
- Persona System: Technical Writer, System Architect, Quality Engineer
activation
Quality Metrics
- Clarity Score (0-10): Language precision and understandability
- Completeness Score (0-10): Coverage of essential elements
- Testability Score (0-10): Measurability and validation capability
- Consistency Score (0-10): Internal coherence assessment
📊 Output Examples
Expert Critique Format
KARL WIEGERS - Requirements Engineering:
❌ CRITICAL: Password complexity requirements not specified
📝 RECOMMENDATION: Add requirement "System SHALL enforce password
complexity: minimum 8 characters, mixed case, numbers"
🎯 PRIORITY: High - Security vulnerability without standards
📊 QUALITY IMPACT: +35% security compliance, +20% completeness
Improvement Roadmap
- Immediate: Critical security and clarity issues
- Short-term: Architecture refinements and testing strategies
- Long-term: Evolution planning and advanced optimizations
🚀 Integration Patterns
Workflow
1. Generate specification using
https://github.com/github/spec-kit/blob/main/spec-driven.md
2. Review and improve with expert panel
3. Iterative refinement based on feedback
CI/CD Integration
- Specification validation in development workflow
- Quality gate enforcement with automated checks
- Version control integration for evolution tracking
📈 Quality Impact
Based on an example review:
- Security Completeness: +35% improvement
- Requirements Clarity: +14% improvement
- Testability Score: +19% improvement
- Production Readiness: +47% improvement
- Overall Quality: +24% improvement
🎓 Learning Features
Educational Value
- Socratic questioning mode for skill development
- Expert methodology exposure and learning
- Progressive specification writing guidance
- Best practice pattern recognition
Mentoring Integration
- Step-by-step improvement guidance
- Industry standard alignment
- Professional specification writing techniques
🔗 Files Changed
- SuperClaude/Commands/spec-panel.md - Complete command specification
🧪 Testing
Includes comprehensive examples:
- API specification review with security focus
- Requirements workshop with collaborative analysis
- Architecture validation with socratic questioning
- Multi-iteration improvement workflows
This feature significantly enhances SuperClaude's specification analysis
capabilities, providing professional-grade review and improvement
guidance through authentic expert perspectives and proven methodologies.
2025-09-09 17:01:56 +02:00
| **spec-panel** | Specification review | Requirements validation, architecture analysis |
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
| **troubleshoot** | Problem diagnosis | Bug investigation, performance issues |
| **explain** | Code explanation | Learning, code reviews |
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### Quality Commands
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
| Command | Purpose | Best For |
|---------|---------|----------|
| **improve** | Code enhancement | Performance optimization, refactoring |
| **cleanup** | Technical debt | Dead code removal, organization |
| **test** | Quality assurance | Test automation, coverage analysis |
| **document** | Documentation | API docs, user guides |
### Project Management
| Command | Purpose | Best For |
|---------|---------|----------|
| **estimate** | Project estimation | Timeline planning, resource allocation |
| **task** | Task management | Complex workflows, task tracking |
| **spawn** | Meta-orchestration | Large-scale projects, parallel execution |
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
### Utility Commands
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
| Command | Purpose | Best For |
|---------|---------|----------|
2025-09-15 15:03:33 +00:00
| **help** | List all commands | Discovering available commands |
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
| **git** | Version control | Commit management, branch strategies |
| **index** | Command discovery | Exploring capabilities, finding commands |
### Session Commands
| Command | Purpose | Best For |
|---------|---------|----------|
| **load** | Context loading | Session initialization, project onboarding |
| **save** | Session persistence | Checkpointing, context preservation |
| **reflect** | Task validation | Progress assessment, completion validation |
| **select-tool** | Tool optimization | Performance optimization, tool selection |
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
---
## Command Index
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**By Function:**
- **Planning**: brainstorm, design, workflow, estimate
- **Development**: implement, build, git
added spec-panel, which transforms the project specs though the lens … (#346)
Introduces a multi-expert specification review and improvement system
powered by renowned software engineering and specification experts. This
command transforms technical specifications through the lens of industry
experts, providing actionable feedback and systematic improvement
recommendations.
🎯 Key Features
Expert Panel System
- 10 Industry Experts: Karl Wiegers, Gojko Adzic, Alistair Cockburn,
Martin Fowler, Michael Nygard, Sam Newman, Gregor Hohpe, Lisa Crispin,
Janet Gregory, and Kelsey Hightower
- Domain Specialization: Requirements engineering, architecture,
testing,
compliance, and cloud-native patterns
- Authentic Methodologies: Each expert applies their real-world
frameworks and critique styles
Analysis Modes
- Discussion Mode: Collaborative improvement through expert dialogue
- Critique Mode: Systematic review with prioritized recommendations
- Socratic Mode: Learning-focused questioning for deeper understanding
Focus Areas
- Requirements: Clarity, completeness, testability validation
- Architecture: Interface design, scalability, maintainability analysis
- Testing: Quality attributes, coverage, edge case identification
- Compliance: Regulatory requirements, security, operational excellence
🔧 Technical Implementation
Command Structure
/sc:spec-panel [content|@file] [--mode discussion|critique|socratic]
[--focus area] [--iterations N]
MCP Integration
- Sequential MCP: Expert panel coordination and structured analysis
- Context7 MCP: Industry patterns and best practices
- Persona System: Technical Writer, System Architect, Quality Engineer
activation
Quality Metrics
- Clarity Score (0-10): Language precision and understandability
- Completeness Score (0-10): Coverage of essential elements
- Testability Score (0-10): Measurability and validation capability
- Consistency Score (0-10): Internal coherence assessment
📊 Output Examples
Expert Critique Format
KARL WIEGERS - Requirements Engineering:
❌ CRITICAL: Password complexity requirements not specified
📝 RECOMMENDATION: Add requirement "System SHALL enforce password
complexity: minimum 8 characters, mixed case, numbers"
🎯 PRIORITY: High - Security vulnerability without standards
📊 QUALITY IMPACT: +35% security compliance, +20% completeness
Improvement Roadmap
- Immediate: Critical security and clarity issues
- Short-term: Architecture refinements and testing strategies
- Long-term: Evolution planning and advanced optimizations
🚀 Integration Patterns
Workflow
1. Generate specification using
https://github.com/github/spec-kit/blob/main/spec-driven.md
2. Review and improve with expert panel
3. Iterative refinement based on feedback
CI/CD Integration
- Specification validation in development workflow
- Quality gate enforcement with automated checks
- Version control integration for evolution tracking
📈 Quality Impact
Based on an example review:
- Security Completeness: +35% improvement
- Requirements Clarity: +14% improvement
- Testability Score: +19% improvement
- Production Readiness: +47% improvement
- Overall Quality: +24% improvement
🎓 Learning Features
Educational Value
- Socratic questioning mode for skill development
- Expert methodology exposure and learning
- Progressive specification writing guidance
- Best practice pattern recognition
Mentoring Integration
- Step-by-step improvement guidance
- Industry standard alignment
- Professional specification writing techniques
🔗 Files Changed
- SuperClaude/Commands/spec-panel.md - Complete command specification
🧪 Testing
Includes comprehensive examples:
- API specification review with security focus
- Requirements workshop with collaborative analysis
- Architecture validation with socratic questioning
- Multi-iteration improvement workflows
This feature significantly enhances SuperClaude's specification analysis
capabilities, providing professional-grade review and improvement
guidance through authentic expert perspectives and proven methodologies.
2025-09-09 17:01:56 +02:00
- **Analysis**: analyze, business-panel, spec-panel, troubleshoot, explain
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
- **Quality**: improve, cleanup, test, document
- **Management**: task, spawn, load, save, reflect
2025-09-15 15:03:33 +00:00
- **Utility**: help, index, select-tool
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**By Complexity:**
2025-09-15 15:03:33 +00:00
- **Beginner**: brainstorm, implement, analyze, test, help
added spec-panel, which transforms the project specs though the lens … (#346)
Introduces a multi-expert specification review and improvement system
powered by renowned software engineering and specification experts. This
command transforms technical specifications through the lens of industry
experts, providing actionable feedback and systematic improvement
recommendations.
🎯 Key Features
Expert Panel System
- 10 Industry Experts: Karl Wiegers, Gojko Adzic, Alistair Cockburn,
Martin Fowler, Michael Nygard, Sam Newman, Gregor Hohpe, Lisa Crispin,
Janet Gregory, and Kelsey Hightower
- Domain Specialization: Requirements engineering, architecture,
testing,
compliance, and cloud-native patterns
- Authentic Methodologies: Each expert applies their real-world
frameworks and critique styles
Analysis Modes
- Discussion Mode: Collaborative improvement through expert dialogue
- Critique Mode: Systematic review with prioritized recommendations
- Socratic Mode: Learning-focused questioning for deeper understanding
Focus Areas
- Requirements: Clarity, completeness, testability validation
- Architecture: Interface design, scalability, maintainability analysis
- Testing: Quality attributes, coverage, edge case identification
- Compliance: Regulatory requirements, security, operational excellence
🔧 Technical Implementation
Command Structure
/sc:spec-panel [content|@file] [--mode discussion|critique|socratic]
[--focus area] [--iterations N]
MCP Integration
- Sequential MCP: Expert panel coordination and structured analysis
- Context7 MCP: Industry patterns and best practices
- Persona System: Technical Writer, System Architect, Quality Engineer
activation
Quality Metrics
- Clarity Score (0-10): Language precision and understandability
- Completeness Score (0-10): Coverage of essential elements
- Testability Score (0-10): Measurability and validation capability
- Consistency Score (0-10): Internal coherence assessment
📊 Output Examples
Expert Critique Format
KARL WIEGERS - Requirements Engineering:
❌ CRITICAL: Password complexity requirements not specified
📝 RECOMMENDATION: Add requirement "System SHALL enforce password
complexity: minimum 8 characters, mixed case, numbers"
🎯 PRIORITY: High - Security vulnerability without standards
📊 QUALITY IMPACT: +35% security compliance, +20% completeness
Improvement Roadmap
- Immediate: Critical security and clarity issues
- Short-term: Architecture refinements and testing strategies
- Long-term: Evolution planning and advanced optimizations
🚀 Integration Patterns
Workflow
1. Generate specification using
https://github.com/github/spec-kit/blob/main/spec-driven.md
2. Review and improve with expert panel
3. Iterative refinement based on feedback
CI/CD Integration
- Specification validation in development workflow
- Quality gate enforcement with automated checks
- Version control integration for evolution tracking
📈 Quality Impact
Based on an example review:
- Security Completeness: +35% improvement
- Requirements Clarity: +14% improvement
- Testability Score: +19% improvement
- Production Readiness: +47% improvement
- Overall Quality: +24% improvement
🎓 Learning Features
Educational Value
- Socratic questioning mode for skill development
- Expert methodology exposure and learning
- Progressive specification writing guidance
- Best practice pattern recognition
Mentoring Integration
- Step-by-step improvement guidance
- Industry standard alignment
- Professional specification writing techniques
🔗 Files Changed
- SuperClaude/Commands/spec-panel.md - Complete command specification
🧪 Testing
Includes comprehensive examples:
- API specification review with security focus
- Requirements workshop with collaborative analysis
- Architecture validation with socratic questioning
- Multi-iteration improvement workflows
This feature significantly enhances SuperClaude's specification analysis
capabilities, providing professional-grade review and improvement
guidance through authentic expert perspectives and proven methodologies.
2025-09-09 17:01:56 +02:00
- **Intermediate**: workflow, design, business-panel, spec-panel, improve, document
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
- **Advanced**: spawn, task, select-tool, reflect
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
## Troubleshooting
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Command Issues:**
- **Command not found**: Verify installation: `python3 -m SuperClaude --version`
- **No response**: Restart Claude Code session
2025-08-22 19:18:44 +02:00
- **Processing delays**: Use `--no-mcp` to test without MCP servers
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
**Quick Fixes:**
- Reset session: `/sc:load` to reinitialize
- Check status: `SuperClaude install --list-components`
- Get help: [Troubleshooting Guide ](../Reference/troubleshooting.md )
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
## Next Steps
2025-08-18 11:58:55 +02:00
2025-08-21 19:03:25 +02:00
- [Flags Guide ](flags.md ) - Control command behavior
- [Agents Guide ](agents.md ) - Specialist activation
- [Examples Cookbook ](../Reference/examples-cookbook.md ) - Real usage patterns