--- name: iso27001-compliance description: Implement ISO 27001 Information Security Management System. Configure ISMS controls and risk management. Use when implementing enterprise security frameworks. license: MIT metadata: author: devops-skills version: "1.0" --- # ISO 27001 Compliance Implement an Information Security Management System (ISMS) aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022. ## When to Use - Establishing an ISMS for the first time in an organization - Preparing for ISO 27001 certification audit - Conducting risk assessments and developing risk treatment plans - Creating the Statement of Applicability (SoA) - Transitioning from ISO 27001:2013 to the 2022 revision - Meeting customer or regulatory requirements for ISO 27001 certification ## ISMS Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle ```yaml pdca_cycle: plan: - Define ISMS scope and boundaries - Establish information security policy - Conduct risk assessment - Develop risk treatment plan - Produce Statement of Applicability - Obtain management approval and commitment - Define security objectives and metrics do: - Implement selected Annex A controls - Deploy technical security controls - Conduct security awareness training - Document all procedures and processes - Implement incident management process - Establish supplier security management check: - Conduct internal audits (at least annual) - Perform management review meetings - Monitor and measure control effectiveness - Review incident trends and near misses - Assess compliance with legal requirements - Evaluate security metrics against objectives act: - Address nonconformities with corrective actions - Implement continual improvement initiatives - Update risk assessment based on changes - Refine controls based on audit findings - Communicate improvements to stakeholders ``` ## ISMS Scope Definition ```yaml isms_scope: template: organization: "Company Name, Ltd." scope_statement: | The ISMS covers the design, development, operation, and support of the Company's cloud-based SaaS platform, including all supporting infrastructure, personnel, and processes at the following locations. included: locations: - "Primary office: 123 Main Street, City, Country" - "AWS us-east-1 and eu-west-1 regions" - "Remote workers accessing corporate systems" business_processes: - "Software development and deployment" - "Cloud infrastructure management" - "Customer data processing and storage" - "Customer support operations" - "Corporate IT and internal systems" information_assets: - "Customer data (PII, business data)" - "Source code and intellectual property" - "Employee personal data" - "Financial records" - "Security configurations and credentials" technology: - "AWS cloud infrastructure" - "SaaS application stack" - "Corporate IT systems (Google Workspace, Okta, Jira)" - "Development tools (GitHub, CI/CD pipelines)" excluded: - "Physical data center operations (inherited from AWS)" - "Third-party SaaS platforms beyond integration points" exclusion_justification: "Physical data center controls are inherited from AWS, which maintains its own ISO 27001 certification." interfaces: - "Customer API endpoints" - "Third-party integrations (payment processor, email provider)" - "AWS management plane" ``` ## Risk Assessment Process ```yaml risk_assessment: methodology: approach: "Asset-based risk assessment" risk_formula: "Risk = Likelihood x Impact" scale: "1-5 for both likelihood and impact (total 1-25)" likelihood_scale: 1: "Rare - less than once per 5 years" 2: "Unlikely - once per 2-5 years" 3: "Possible - once per 1-2 years" 4: "Likely - multiple times per year" 5: "Almost Certain - monthly or more frequent" impact_scale: 1: "Negligible - minimal operational impact, no data loss" 2: "Minor - limited impact, small data exposure, <$10K cost" 3: "Moderate - significant impact, data breach <1K records, <$100K cost" 4: "Major - severe impact, large data breach, <$1M cost, regulatory action" 5: "Critical - catastrophic, massive breach, >$1M cost, business viability at risk" risk_matrix: # Impact: 1 2 3 4 5 likelihood_5: [5, 10, 15, 20, 25] likelihood_4: [4, 8, 12, 16, 20] likelihood_3: [3, 6, 9, 12, 15] likelihood_2: [2, 4, 6, 8, 10] likelihood_1: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] risk_appetite: accept: "Score 1-4 (low risk, accept with monitoring)" mitigate: "Score 5-14 (medium risk, implement controls to reduce)" escalate: "Score 15-25 (high/critical risk, immediate action required)" treatment_options: mitigate: "Implement controls to reduce likelihood or impact" transfer: "Insurance or contractual transfer to third party" avoid: "Eliminate the risk by removing the activity or asset" accept: "Accept with documented management approval" example_risk_register: - id: "RISK-001" asset: "Customer database" threat: "SQL injection attack" vulnerability: "Insufficient input validation" likelihood: 3 impact: 4 inherent_risk: 12 treatment: "mitigate" controls: ["A.8.28 Secure coding", "A.8.8 Vulnerability management"] residual_likelihood: 1 residual_impact: 4 residual_risk: 4 risk_owner: "CTO" - id: "RISK-002" asset: "Source code repository" threat: "Insider theft of intellectual property" vulnerability: "Excessive access permissions" likelihood: 2 impact: 5 inherent_risk: 10 treatment: "mitigate" controls: ["A.5.15 Access control", "A.8.3 Information access restriction"] residual_likelihood: 1 residual_impact: 5 residual_risk: 5 risk_owner: "VP Engineering" - id: "RISK-003" asset: "Cloud infrastructure" threat: "Cloud provider outage" vulnerability: "Single-region deployment" likelihood: 3 impact: 3 inherent_risk: 9 treatment: "mitigate" controls: ["A.5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity", "A.8.14 Redundancy"] residual_likelihood: 3 residual_impact: 2 residual_risk: 6 risk_owner: "Head of Infrastructure" ``` ## Statement of Applicability (SoA) ```yaml # ISO 27001:2022 Annex A Controls - Statement of Applicability soa_template: organizational_controls_5: "A.5.1": control: "Policies for information security" applicable: true justification: "Required to establish security governance" implementation: "Information security policy approved by CEO, reviewed annually" "A.5.2": control: "Information security roles and responsibilities" applicable: true justification: "Required for accountability" implementation: "RACI matrix for security responsibilities, CISO appointed" "A.5.7": control: "Threat intelligence" applicable: true justification: "Required for proactive threat management" implementation: "Subscribe to threat feeds, CVE monitoring, vendor advisories" "A.5.15": control: "Access control" applicable: true justification: "Required for data protection" implementation: "RBAC via Okta, least-privilege IAM policies, quarterly access reviews" "A.5.23": control: "Information security for use of cloud services" applicable: true justification: "Primary infrastructure is cloud-based" implementation: "AWS security baseline, CSP shared responsibility documented" "A.5.29": control: "Information security during disruption" applicable: true justification: "Business continuity requirement" implementation: "BCP/DR plans tested annually, multi-AZ deployment" "A.5.30": control: "ICT readiness for business continuity" applicable: true justification: "Ensure technology supports continuity" implementation: "DR runbooks, RTO/RPO defined, failover tested quarterly" people_controls_6: "A.6.1": control: "Screening" applicable: true implementation: "Background checks for all employees before hiring" "A.6.3": control: "Information security awareness, education and training" applicable: true implementation: "Annual security training, phishing simulations quarterly" "A.6.5": control: "Responsibilities after termination or change of employment" applicable: true implementation: "Offboarding checklist, access revoked within 24 hours" physical_controls_7: "A.7.1": control: "Physical security perimeters" applicable: false exclusion_justification: "No company-operated data centers, inherited from AWS" technology_controls_8: "A.8.1": control: "User endpoint devices" applicable: true implementation: "MDM enrollment, disk encryption, screen lock policy" "A.8.5": control: "Secure authentication" applicable: true implementation: "MFA required for all systems, SSO via Okta" "A.8.8": control: "Management of technical vulnerabilities" applicable: true implementation: "Weekly vulnerability scans, 30-day patch SLA for critical" "A.8.9": control: "Configuration management" applicable: true implementation: "Infrastructure as code, AWS Config rules, baseline hardening" "A.8.15": control: "Logging" applicable: true implementation: "Centralized logging via CloudWatch + SIEM, 12-month retention" "A.8.16": control: "Monitoring activities" applicable: true implementation: "SIEM alerting, 24/7 on-call rotation, anomaly detection" "A.8.24": control: "Use of cryptography" applicable: true implementation: "TLS 1.2+, AES-256 at rest, KMS key management" "A.8.25": control: "Secure development lifecycle" applicable: true implementation: "SAST/DAST in CI, code review required, dependency scanning" "A.8.28": control: "Secure coding" applicable: true implementation: "OWASP guidelines, security code review, automated linting" ``` ## Internal Audit Program ```yaml internal_audit: schedule: frequency: "Annual full cycle, quarterly focused audits" cycle: "All ISMS clauses and applicable Annex A controls audited over 12 months" audit_plan_template: audit_id: "IA-2025-Q1" scope: "Clauses 4-10, Annex A controls A.5.1-A.5.15" auditor: "Internal auditor (independent of audited area)" audit_dates: "2025-03-10 to 2025-03-14" areas: - area: "Access Control (A.5.15)" auditee: "IT Security Team" evidence_requested: - "Access review records from last quarter" - "Joiner/mover/leaver process records" - "Privileged access management logs" - area: "Risk Management (Clause 6.1)" auditee: "Risk Management Team" evidence_requested: - "Current risk register" - "Risk assessment methodology document" - "Management risk review meeting minutes" finding_categories: major_nonconformity: "Requirement not met, significant risk to ISMS effectiveness" minor_nonconformity: "Requirement partially met, limited risk" observation: "Area for improvement, no requirement breach" positive_finding: "Notably effective implementation" corrective_action: major: "Root cause analysis within 10 days, corrective action within 30 days" minor: "Corrective action within 60 days" observation: "Address in next ISMS review cycle" verification: "Auditor verifies corrective action effectiveness" ``` ## Management Review Meeting ```yaml management_review: frequency: "At least annually, recommended quarterly" attendees: required: - "CEO or Managing Director" - "CISO or Information Security Manager" - "Department heads" optional: - "Internal auditor" - "Risk manager" - "External consultant" mandatory_inputs: - "Status of actions from previous management reviews" - "Changes in external and internal issues relevant to the ISMS" - "Information security performance (metrics and KPIs)" - "Audit results (internal and external)" - "Incident trends and nonconformities" - "Risk assessment results and risk treatment plan status" - "Interested party feedback" - "Opportunities for continual improvement" mandatory_outputs: - "Decisions on continual improvement opportunities" - "Decisions on changes needed to the ISMS" - "Resource allocation decisions" - "Updated risk acceptance decisions" kpis_to_report: - "Number and severity of security incidents" - "Vulnerability remediation SLA compliance" - "Security awareness training completion rate" - "Access review completion rate" - "Audit finding closure rate" - "Risk treatment plan progress" - "Patch compliance percentage" ``` ## ISO 27001 Certification Checklist ```yaml certification_checklist: stage_1_audit_preparation: - [ ] ISMS scope documented and approved - [ ] Information security policy published - [ ] Risk assessment methodology defined - [ ] Risk assessment completed with risk register - [ ] Risk treatment plan developed - [ ] Statement of Applicability completed - [ ] ISMS objectives defined with measurable targets - [ ] Internal audit program established - [ ] At least one full internal audit completed - [ ] Management review conducted with minutes documented - [ ] Document control process in place stage_2_audit_preparation: - [ ] All Annex A controls implemented per SoA - [ ] Evidence of control operation for 3+ months - [ ] Corrective actions from internal audit tracked and closed - [ ] Security awareness training delivered and recorded - [ ] Incident management process operational with records - [ ] Supplier security assessments performed - [ ] Business continuity plan tested - [ ] All mandatory documented information available - [ ] Employees aware of security policy and their responsibilities surveillance_audit_readiness: - [ ] All corrective actions from certification audit closed - [ ] Continuous internal audit schedule maintained - [ ] Management reviews conducted per schedule - [ ] Risk register updated with new threats and changes - [ ] Metrics demonstrate ISMS effectiveness - [ ] Changes to ISMS scope documented ``` ## Best Practices - Secure visible management commitment with a signed information security policy - Define ISMS scope carefully; too broad makes certification expensive, too narrow reduces value - Use an asset-based risk assessment approach to ensure comprehensive coverage - Maintain the Statement of Applicability as a living document aligned with the risk register - Conduct internal audits with auditors independent of the area being audited - Hold management review meetings quarterly rather than only annually - Integrate ISO 27001 controls into daily operations rather than treating them as a separate compliance exercise - Use metrics and KPIs to demonstrate ISMS effectiveness to auditors and management - Plan for the 3-year certification cycle: certification audit, then two surveillance audits - Start collecting evidence of control operation at least 3 months before the Stage 2 audit