fix(bmm): complete cleanup of epic-tech-context workflow removal (#1001)

- Remove references to deprecated epic-tech-context, story-context,
  validate-epic-tech-context, validate-story-context, and story-done workflows
- Simplify epic status: backlog → in-progress → done (was backlog → contexted)
- Update create-story to handle legacy 'contexted' status for backward compat
- Clean up sprint-planning instructions and status template
- Update docs: agents-guide, brownfield-guide, faq, glossary, quick-start

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-authored-by: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Brian <bmadcode@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alex Verkhovsky
2025-11-30 21:52:04 -08:00
committed by GitHub
parent afd2a163bf
commit fe0817f590
13 changed files with 99 additions and 155 deletions

View File

@@ -182,13 +182,8 @@ The BMad Method Module (BMM) provides a comprehensive team of specialized AI age
- `workflow-status` - Check what to do next
- `sprint-planning` - Initialize `sprint-status.yaml` tracking
- `epic-tech-context` - Optional epic-specific technical context
- `validate-epic-tech-context` - Validate epic technical context
- `create-story` - Draft next story from epic
- `validate-create-story` - Independent story validation
- `story-context` - Assemble dynamic technical context XML
- `validate-story-context` - Validate story context
- `story-ready-for-dev` - Mark story ready without context generation
- `epic-retrospective` - Post-epic review
- `correct-course` - Handle changes during implementation
@@ -230,7 +225,6 @@ The BMad Method Module (BMM) provides a comprehensive team of specialized AI age
- Repository docs reference
- MCP server best practices
- Web search fallback
- `story-done` - Mark story complete and advance queue
**Communication Style:** Succinct and checklist-driven. Cites file paths and acceptance criteria IDs. Only asks questions when inputs are missing.
@@ -458,7 +452,6 @@ The BMad Method Module (BMM) provides a comprehensive team of specialized AI age
- `workflow-status` - Check what to do next
- `develop-story` - Execute Dev Story workflow, implementing tasks and tests
- `story-done` - Mark story done after DoD complete
- `code-review` - Perform thorough clean context QA code review on a story
**Communication Style:** Direct and energetic. Execution-focused. Breaks down complex game challenges into actionable steps. Celebrates performance wins.
@@ -649,15 +642,13 @@ Some workflows are available to multiple agents:
Many workflows have optional validation workflows that perform independent review:
| Validation | Agent | Validates |
| ---------------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------- |
| `validate-prd` | PM | PRD completeness (FRs/NFRs only) |
| `validate-tech-spec` | PM | Technical specification quality |
| `validate-architecture` | Architect | Architecture document |
| `validate-design` | UX Designer | UX specification and artifacts |
| `validate-epic-tech-context` | SM | Epic technical context |
| `validate-create-story` | SM | Story draft |
| `validate-story-context` | SM | Story context XML |
| Validation | Agent | Validates |
| ----------------------- | ----------- | -------------------------------- |
| `validate-prd` | PM | PRD completeness (FRs/NFRs only) |
| `validate-tech-spec` | PM | Technical specification quality |
| `validate-architecture` | Architect | Architecture document |
| `validate-design` | UX Designer | UX specification and artifacts |
| `validate-create-story` | SM | Story draft |
**When to use validation:**
@@ -912,13 +903,10 @@ Load the customized agent and verify the changes are reflected in its behavior a
**Story Development Cycle:**
```
1. SM: *epic-tech-context (optional, once per epic)
2. SM: *create-story
3. SM: *story-context
4. DEV: *develop-story
5. DEV: *code-review
6. DEV: *story-done
7. Repeat steps 2-6 for next story
1. SM: *create-story
2. DEV: *develop-story
3. DEV: *code-review
4. Repeat steps 1-3 for next story
```
**Testing Strategy:**
@@ -992,12 +980,12 @@ Quick reference for agent selection:
| **UX Designer** | 🎨 | 2 (Planning) | create-ux-design, validate-design | UX-heavy projects, design |
| **Architect** | 🏗️ | 3 (Solutioning) | architecture, implementation-readiness | Technical design, architecture |
| **SM** | 🏃 | 4 (Implementation) | sprint-planning, create-story, story-context | Story management, sprint coordination |
| **DEV** | 💻 | 4 (Implementation) | develop-story, code-review, story-done | Implementation, coding |
| **DEV** | 💻 | 4 (Implementation) | develop-story, code-review | Implementation, coding |
| **TEA** | 🧪 | All Phases | framework, atdd, automate, trace, ci | Testing, quality assurance |
| **Paige (Tech Writer)** | 📚 | All Phases | document-project, diagrams, validation | Documentation, diagrams |
| **Principal Engineer** | ⚡ | Quick Flow (All phases) | create-tech-spec, quick-dev, code-review | Rapid development, technical leadership |
| **Game Designer** | 🎲 | 1-2 (Games) | brainstorm-game, gdd, narrative | Game design, creative vision |
| **Game Developer** | 🕹️ | 4 (Games) | develop-story, story-done, code-review | Game implementation |
| **Game Developer** | 🕹️ | 4 (Games) | develop-story, code-review | Game implementation |
| **Game Architect** | 🏛️ | 3 (Games) | architecture, implementation-readiness | Game systems architecture |
| **BMad Master** | 🧙 | Meta | party-mode, list tasks/workflows | Orchestration, multi-agent |
@@ -1087,10 +1075,8 @@ Quick reference for agent selection:
- [ ] SM: `*sprint-planning` (once)
- [ ] SM: `*create-story`
- [ ] SM: `*story-context`
- [ ] DEV: `*develop-story`
- [ ] DEV: `*code-review`
- [ ] DEV: `*story-done`
**Testing Strategy:**