mirror of
https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD.git
synced 2025-12-29 16:14:59 +00:00
feat: Extract BMGD module and implement workflow vendoring
This commit extracts game development functionality from BMM into a standalone BMGD (BMad Game Development) module and implements workflow vendoring to enable module independence. BMGD Module Creation: - Moved agents: game-designer, game-dev, game-architect from BMM to BMGD - Moved team config: team-gamedev - Created new Game Dev Scrum Master agent using workflow vendoring pattern - Reorganized workflows into industry-standard game dev phases: * Phase 1 (Preproduction): brainstorm-game, game-brief * Phase 2 (Design): gdd, narrative * Phase 3 (Technical): game-architecture * Phase 4 (Production): vendored from BMM workflows - Updated all module metadata and config_source references Workflow Vendoring Feature: - Enables modules to copy workflows from other modules during installation - Build-time process that updates config_source in vendored workflows - New agent YAML attribute: workflow-install (build-time metadata) - Final compiled agents use workflow-install value for workflow attribute - Implementation in module manager: vendorCrossModuleWorkflows() - Allows standalone module installation without forced dependencies Technical Changes: - tools/cli/lib/yaml-xml-builder.js: Use workflow-install for workflow attribute - tools/cli/installers/lib/modules/manager.js: Add vendoring functions - tools/schema/agent.js: Add workflow-install to menu item schema - Updated 3 documentation files with workflow vendoring details BMM Workflow Updates: - workflow-status/init: Added game detection checkpoint - workflow-status/paths/game-design.yaml: Redirect to BMGD module - prd/instructions.md: Route game projects to BMGD - research/instructions-market.md: Reference BMGD for game development Documentation: - Created comprehensive BMGD module README - Added workflow vendoring documentation - Updated BMB agent creation and module creation guides
This commit is contained in:
Brian Madison
@@ -1,26 +0,0 @@
|
||||
category,technique_name,description,facilitation_prompts,best_for,energy_level,typical_duration
|
||||
game_design,MDA Framework Exploration,Explore game concepts through Mechanics-Dynamics-Aesthetics lens to ensure cohesive design from implementation to player experience,What mechanics create the core loop?|What dynamics emerge from these mechanics?|What aesthetic experience results?|How do they align?,holistic-design,moderate,20-30
|
||||
game_design,Core Loop Brainstorming,Design the fundamental moment-to-moment gameplay loop that players repeat - the heartbeat of your game,What does the player do?|What's the immediate reward?|Why do it again?|How does it evolve?,gameplay-foundation,high,15-25
|
||||
game_design,Player Fantasy Mining,Identify and amplify the core fantasy that players want to embody - what makes them feel powerful and engaged,What fantasy does the player live?|What makes them feel awesome?|What power do they wield?|What identity do they assume?,player-motivation,high,15-20
|
||||
game_design,Genre Mashup,Combine unexpected game genres to create innovative hybrid experiences that offer fresh gameplay,Take two unrelated genres|How do they merge?|What unique gameplay emerges?|What's the hook?,innovation,high,15-20
|
||||
game_design,Verbs Before Nouns,Focus on what players DO before what things ARE - prioritize actions over objects for engaging gameplay,What verbs define your game?|What actions feel good?|Build mechanics from verbs|Nouns support actions,mechanics-first,moderate,20-25
|
||||
game_design,Failure State Design,Work backwards from interesting failure conditions to create tension and meaningful choices,How can players fail interestingly?|What makes failure feel fair?|How does failure teach?|Recovery mechanics?,challenge-design,moderate,15-20
|
||||
game_design,Progression Curve Sculpting,Map the player's emotional and skill journey from tutorial to mastery - pace challenge and revelation,How does difficulty evolve?|When do we introduce concepts?|What's the skill ceiling?|How do we maintain flow?,pacing-balance,moderate,25-30
|
||||
game_design,Emergence Engineering,Design simple rule interactions that create complex unexpected player-driven outcomes,What simple rules combine?|What emerges from interactions?|How do players surprise you?|Systemic possibilities?,depth-complexity,moderate,20-25
|
||||
game_design,Accessibility Layers,Brainstorm how different skill levels and abilities can access your core experience meaningfully,Who might struggle with what?|What alternate inputs exist?|How do we preserve challenge?|Inclusive design options?,inclusive-design,moderate,20-25
|
||||
game_design,Reward Schedule Architecture,Design the timing and type of rewards to maintain player motivation and engagement,What rewards when?|Variable or fixed schedule?|Intrinsic vs extrinsic rewards?|Progression satisfaction?,engagement-retention,moderate,20-30
|
||||
narrative_game,Ludonarrative Harmony,Align story and gameplay so mechanics reinforce narrative themes - make meaning through play,What does gameplay express?|How do mechanics tell story?|Where do they conflict?|How to unify theme?,storytelling,moderate,20-25
|
||||
narrative_game,Environmental Storytelling,Use world design and ambient details to convey narrative without explicit exposition,What does the space communicate?|What happened here before?|Visual narrative clues?|Show don't tell?,world-building,moderate,15-20
|
||||
narrative_game,Player Agency Moments,Identify key decision points where player choice shapes narrative in meaningful ways,What choices matter?|How do consequences manifest?|Branch vs flavor choices?|Meaningful agency where?,player-choice,moderate,20-25
|
||||
narrative_game,Emotion Targeting,Design specific moments intended to evoke targeted emotional responses through integrated design,What emotion when?|How do all elements combine?|Music + mechanics + narrative?|Orchestrated feelings?,emotional-design,high,20-30
|
||||
systems_game,Economy Balancing Thought Experiments,Explore resource generation/consumption balance to prevent game-breaking exploits,What resources exist?|Generation vs consumption rates?|What loops emerge?|Where's the exploit?,economy-design,moderate,25-30
|
||||
systems_game,Meta-Game Layer Design,Brainstorm progression systems that persist beyond individual play sessions,What carries over between sessions?|Long-term goals?|How does meta feed core loop?|Retention hooks?,retention-systems,moderate,20-25
|
||||
multiplayer_game,Social Dynamics Mapping,Anticipate how players will interact and design mechanics that support desired social behaviors,How will players cooperate?|Competitive dynamics?|Toxic behavior prevention?|Positive interaction rewards?,social-design,moderate,20-30
|
||||
multiplayer_game,Spectator Experience Design,Consider how watching others play can be entertaining - esports and streaming potential,What's fun to watch?|Readable visual clarity?|Highlight moments?|Narrative for observers?,spectator-value,moderate,15-20
|
||||
creative_game,Constraint-Based Creativity,Embrace a specific limitation as your core design constraint and build everything around it,Pick a severe constraint|What if this was your ONLY mechanic?|Build a full game from limitation|Constraint as creativity catalyst,innovation,moderate,15-25
|
||||
creative_game,Game Feel Playground,Focus purely on how controls and feedback FEEL before worrying about context or goals,What feels juicy to do?|Controller response?|Visual/audio feedback?|Satisfying micro-interactions?,game-feel,high,20-30
|
||||
creative_game,One Button Game Challenge,Design interesting gameplay using only a single input - forces elegant simplicity,Only one button - what can it do?|Context changes meaning?|Timing variations?|Depth from simplicity?,minimalist-design,moderate,15-20
|
||||
wild_game,Remix an Existing Game,Take a well-known game and twist one core element - what new experience emerges?,Pick a famous game|Change ONE fundamental rule|What ripples from that change?|New game from mutation?,rapid-prototyping,high,10-15
|
||||
wild_game,Anti-Game Design,Design a game that deliberately breaks common conventions - subvert player expectations,What if we broke this rule?|Expectation subversion?|Anti-patterns as features?|Avant-garde possibilities?,experimental,moderate,15-20
|
||||
wild_game,Physics Playground,Start with an interesting physics interaction and build a game around that sensation,What physics are fun to play with?|Build game from physics toy|Emergent physics gameplay?|Sensation first?,prototype-first,high,15-25
|
||||
wild_game,Toy Before Game,Create a playful interactive toy with no goals first - then discover the game within it,What's fun to mess with?|No goals yet - just play|What game emerges organically?|Toy to game evolution?,discovery-design,high,20-30
|
||||
|
@@ -1,115 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Game Brainstorming Context
|
||||
|
||||
This context guide provides game-specific considerations for brainstorming sessions focused on game design and development.
|
||||
|
||||
## Session Focus Areas
|
||||
|
||||
When brainstorming for games, consider exploring:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Core Gameplay Loop** - What players do moment-to-moment
|
||||
- **Player Fantasy** - What identity/power fantasy does the game fulfill?
|
||||
- **Game Mechanics** - Rules and interactions that define play
|
||||
- **Game Dynamics** - Emergent behaviors from mechanic interactions
|
||||
- **Aesthetic Experience** - Emotional responses and feelings evoked
|
||||
- **Progression Systems** - How players grow and unlock content
|
||||
- **Challenge and Difficulty** - How to create engaging difficulty curves
|
||||
- **Social/Multiplayer Features** - How players interact with each other
|
||||
- **Narrative and World** - Story, setting, and environmental storytelling
|
||||
- **Art Direction and Feel** - Visual style and game feel
|
||||
- **Monetization** - Business model and revenue approach (if applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
## Game Design Frameworks
|
||||
|
||||
### MDA Framework
|
||||
|
||||
- **Mechanics** - Rules and systems (what's in the code)
|
||||
- **Dynamics** - Runtime behavior (how mechanics interact)
|
||||
- **Aesthetics** - Emotional responses (what players feel)
|
||||
|
||||
### Player Motivation (Bartle's Taxonomy)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Achievers** - Goal completion and progression
|
||||
- **Explorers** - Discovery and understanding systems
|
||||
- **Socializers** - Interaction and relationships
|
||||
- **Killers** - Competition and dominance
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Experience Questions
|
||||
|
||||
- What does the player DO? (Verbs first, nouns second)
|
||||
- What makes them feel powerful/competent/awesome?
|
||||
- What's the central tension or challenge?
|
||||
- What's the "one more turn" factor?
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommended Brainstorming Techniques
|
||||
|
||||
### Game Design Specific Techniques
|
||||
|
||||
(These are available as additional techniques in game brainstorming sessions)
|
||||
|
||||
- **MDA Framework Exploration** - Design through mechanics-dynamics-aesthetics
|
||||
- **Core Loop Brainstorming** - Define the heartbeat of gameplay
|
||||
- **Player Fantasy Mining** - Identify and amplify player power fantasies
|
||||
- **Genre Mashup** - Combine unexpected genres for innovation
|
||||
- **Verbs Before Nouns** - Focus on actions before objects
|
||||
- **Failure State Design** - Work backwards from interesting failures
|
||||
- **Ludonarrative Harmony** - Align story and gameplay
|
||||
- **Game Feel Playground** - Focus purely on how controls feel
|
||||
|
||||
### Standard Techniques Well-Suited for Games
|
||||
|
||||
- **SCAMPER Method** - Innovate on existing game mechanics
|
||||
- **What If Scenarios** - Explore radical gameplay possibilities
|
||||
- **First Principles Thinking** - Rebuild game concepts from scratch
|
||||
- **Role Playing** - Generate ideas from player perspectives
|
||||
- **Analogical Thinking** - Find inspiration from other games/media
|
||||
- **Constraint-Based Creativity** - Design around limitations
|
||||
- **Morphological Analysis** - Explore mechanic combinations
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Guidance
|
||||
|
||||
Effective game brainstorming sessions should capture:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Core Concept** - High-level game vision and hook
|
||||
2. **Key Mechanics** - Primary gameplay verbs and interactions
|
||||
3. **Player Experience** - What it feels like to play
|
||||
4. **Unique Elements** - What makes this game special/different
|
||||
5. **Design Challenges** - Obstacles to solve during development
|
||||
6. **Prototype Ideas** - What to test first
|
||||
7. **Reference Games** - Existing games that inspire or inform
|
||||
8. **Open Questions** - What needs further exploration
|
||||
|
||||
## Integration with Game Development Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
Game brainstorming sessions typically feed into:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Game Briefs** - High-level vision and core pillars
|
||||
- **Game Design Documents (GDD)** - Comprehensive design specifications
|
||||
- **Technical Design Docs** - Architecture for game systems
|
||||
- **Prototype Plans** - What to build to validate concepts
|
||||
- **Art Direction Documents** - Visual style and feel guides
|
||||
|
||||
## Special Considerations for Game Design
|
||||
|
||||
### Start With The Feel
|
||||
|
||||
- How should controls feel? Responsive? Weighty? Floaty?
|
||||
- What's the "game feel" - the juice and feedback?
|
||||
- Can we prototype the core interaction quickly?
|
||||
|
||||
### Think in Systems
|
||||
|
||||
- How do mechanics interact?
|
||||
- What emergent behaviors arise?
|
||||
- Are there dominant strategies or exploits?
|
||||
|
||||
### Design for Failure
|
||||
|
||||
- How do players fail?
|
||||
- Is failure interesting and instructive?
|
||||
- What's the cost of failure?
|
||||
|
||||
### Player Agency vs. Authored Experience
|
||||
|
||||
- Where do players have meaningful choices?
|
||||
- Where is the experience authored/scripted?
|
||||
- How do we balance freedom and guidance?
|
||||
@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
|
||||
<critical>The workflow execution engine is governed by: {project_root}/bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml</critical>
|
||||
<critical>You MUST have already loaded and processed: {installed_path}/workflow.yaml</critical>
|
||||
<critical>Communicate all responses in {communication_language}</critical>
|
||||
<critical>This is a meta-workflow that orchestrates the CIS brainstorming workflow with game-specific context and additional game design techniques</critical>
|
||||
|
||||
<workflow>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="1" goal="Validate workflow readiness" tag="workflow-status">
|
||||
<action>Check if {output_folder}/bmm-workflow-status.yaml exists</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="status file not found">
|
||||
<output>No workflow status file found. Game brainstorming is optional - you can continue without status tracking.</output>
|
||||
<action>Set standalone_mode = true</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="status file found">
|
||||
<action>Load the FULL file: {output_folder}/bmm-workflow-status.yaml</action>
|
||||
<action>Parse workflow_status section</action>
|
||||
<action>Check status of "brainstorm-game" workflow</action>
|
||||
<action>Get project_level from YAML metadata</action>
|
||||
<action>Find first non-completed workflow (next expected workflow)</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="project_type != 'game'">
|
||||
<output>Note: This is a {{project_type}} project. Game brainstorming is designed for game projects.</output>
|
||||
<ask>Continue with game brainstorming anyway? (y/n)</ask>
|
||||
<check if="n">
|
||||
<action>Exit workflow</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="brainstorm-game status is file path (already completed)">
|
||||
<output>⚠️ Game brainstorming session already completed: {{brainstorm-game status}}</output>
|
||||
<ask>Re-running will create a new session. Continue? (y/n)</ask>
|
||||
<check if="n">
|
||||
<output>Exiting. Use workflow-status to see your next step.</output>
|
||||
<action>Exit workflow</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="brainstorm-game is not the next expected workflow (latter items are completed already in the list)">
|
||||
<output>⚠️ Next expected workflow: {{next_workflow}}. Game brainstorming is out of sequence.</output>
|
||||
<ask>Continue with game brainstorming anyway? (y/n)</ask>
|
||||
<check if="n">
|
||||
<output>Exiting. Run {{next_workflow}} instead.</output>
|
||||
<action>Exit workflow</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<action>Set standalone_mode = false</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="2" goal="Load game brainstorming context and techniques">
|
||||
<action>Read the game context document from: {game_context}</action>
|
||||
<action>This context provides game-specific guidance including:
|
||||
- Focus areas for game ideation (mechanics, narrative, experience, etc.)
|
||||
- Key considerations for game design
|
||||
- Recommended techniques for game brainstorming
|
||||
- Output structure guidance
|
||||
</action>
|
||||
<action>Load game-specific brain techniques from: {game_brain_methods}</action>
|
||||
<action>These additional techniques supplement the standard CIS brainstorming methods with game design-focused approaches like:
|
||||
- MDA Framework exploration
|
||||
- Core loop brainstorming
|
||||
- Player fantasy mining
|
||||
- Genre mashup
|
||||
- And other game-specific ideation methods
|
||||
</action>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="3" goal="Invoke CIS brainstorming with game context">
|
||||
<action>Execute the CIS brainstorming workflow with game context and additional techniques</action>
|
||||
<invoke-workflow path="{core_brainstorming}" data="{game_context}" techniques="{game_brain_methods}">
|
||||
The CIS brainstorming workflow will:
|
||||
- Merge game-specific techniques with standard techniques
|
||||
- Present interactive brainstorming techniques menu
|
||||
- Guide the user through selected ideation methods
|
||||
- Generate and capture brainstorming session results
|
||||
- Save output to: {output_folder}/brainstorming-session-results-{{date}}.md
|
||||
</invoke-workflow>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="4" goal="Update status and complete" tag="workflow-status">
|
||||
<check if="standalone_mode != true">
|
||||
<action>Load the FULL file: {output_folder}/bmm-workflow-status.yaml</action>
|
||||
<action>Find workflow_status key "brainstorm-game"</action>
|
||||
<critical>ONLY write the file path as the status value - no other text, notes, or metadata</critical>
|
||||
<action>Update workflow_status["brainstorm-game"] = "{output_folder}/bmm-brainstorming-session-{{date}}.md"</action>
|
||||
<action>Save file, preserving ALL comments and structure including STATUS DEFINITIONS</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<action>Find first non-completed workflow in workflow_status (next workflow to do)</action>
|
||||
<action>Determine next agent from path file based on next workflow</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<output>**✅ Game Brainstorming Session Complete, {user_name}!**
|
||||
|
||||
**Session Results:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Game brainstorming results saved to: {output_folder}/bmm-brainstorming-session-{{date}}.md
|
||||
|
||||
{{#if standalone_mode != true}}
|
||||
**Status Updated:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Progress tracking updated: brainstorm-game marked complete
|
||||
- Next workflow: {{next_workflow}}
|
||||
{{else}}
|
||||
**Note:** Running in standalone mode (no progress tracking)
|
||||
{{/if}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Next Steps:**
|
||||
|
||||
{{#if standalone_mode != true}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Next workflow:** {{next_workflow}} ({{next_agent}} agent)
|
||||
- **Optional:** You can run other analysis workflows (research, game-brief) before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
Check status anytime with: `workflow-status`
|
||||
{{else}}
|
||||
Since no workflow is in progress:
|
||||
|
||||
- Refer to the BMM workflow guide if unsure what to do next
|
||||
- Or run `workflow-init` to create a workflow path and get guided next steps
|
||||
{{/if}}
|
||||
</output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
</workflow>
|
||||
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Brainstorm Game Workflow Configuration
|
||||
name: "brainstorm-game"
|
||||
description: "Facilitate game brainstorming sessions by orchestrating the CIS brainstorming workflow with game-specific context, guidance, and additional game design techniques."
|
||||
author: "BMad"
|
||||
|
||||
# Critical variables from config
|
||||
config_source: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/config.yaml"
|
||||
output_folder: "{config_source}:output_folder"
|
||||
user_name: "{config_source}:user_name"
|
||||
communication_language: "{config_source}:communication_language"
|
||||
document_output_language: "{config_source}:document_output_language"
|
||||
user_skill_level: "{config_source}:user_skill_level"
|
||||
date: system-generated
|
||||
|
||||
# Module path and component files
|
||||
installed_path: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/brainstorm-game"
|
||||
template: false
|
||||
instructions: "{installed_path}/instructions.md"
|
||||
|
||||
# Context and techniques for game brainstorming
|
||||
game_context: "{installed_path}/game-context.md"
|
||||
game_brain_methods: "{installed_path}/game-brain-methods.csv"
|
||||
|
||||
# CORE brainstorming workflow to invoke
|
||||
core_brainstorming: "{project-root}/bmad/core/workflows/brainstorming/workflow.yaml"
|
||||
|
||||
standalone: true
|
||||
|
||||
web_bundle:
|
||||
name: "brainstorm-game"
|
||||
description: "Facilitate game brainstorming sessions by orchestrating the CIS brainstorming workflow with game-specific context, guidance, and additional game design techniques."
|
||||
author: "BMad"
|
||||
instructions: "bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/brainstorm-game/instructions.md"
|
||||
template: false
|
||||
web_bundle_files:
|
||||
- "bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/brainstorm-game/instructions.md"
|
||||
- "bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/brainstorm-game/game-context.md"
|
||||
- "bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/brainstorm-game/game-brain-methods.csv"
|
||||
- "bmad/core/workflows/brainstorming/workflow.yaml"
|
||||
existing_workflows:
|
||||
- core_brainstorming: "bmad/core/workflows/brainstorming/workflow.yaml"
|
||||
@@ -1,128 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Game Brief Validation Checklist
|
||||
|
||||
Use this checklist to ensure your game brief is complete and ready for GDD creation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Game Vision ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Core Concept** is clear and concise (one sentence)
|
||||
- [ ] **Elevator Pitch** hooks the reader in 2-3 sentences
|
||||
- [ ] **Vision Statement** is aspirational but achievable
|
||||
- [ ] Vision captures the emotional experience you want to create
|
||||
|
||||
## Target Market ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Primary Audience** is specific (not just "gamers")
|
||||
- [ ] Age range and experience level are defined
|
||||
- [ ] Play session expectations are realistic
|
||||
- [ ] **Market Context** demonstrates opportunity
|
||||
- [ ] Competitive landscape is understood
|
||||
- [ ] You know why this audience will care
|
||||
|
||||
## Game Fundamentals ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Core Gameplay Pillars** (2-4) are clearly defined
|
||||
- [ ] Each pillar is specific and measurable
|
||||
- [ ] **Primary Mechanics** describe what players actually DO
|
||||
- [ ] **Player Experience Goals** connect mechanics to emotions
|
||||
- [ ] Core loop is clear and compelling
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope and Constraints ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Target Platforms** are prioritized
|
||||
- [ ] **Development Timeline** is realistic
|
||||
- [ ] **Budget** aligns with scope
|
||||
- [ ] **Team Resources** (size, skills) are documented
|
||||
- [ ] **Technical Constraints** are identified
|
||||
- [ ] Scope matches team capability
|
||||
|
||||
## Reference Framework ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Inspiration Games** (3-5) are listed with specifics
|
||||
- [ ] You know what you're taking vs. NOT taking from each
|
||||
- [ ] **Competitive Analysis** covers direct and indirect competitors
|
||||
- [ ] **Key Differentiators** are genuine and valuable
|
||||
- [ ] Differentiators are specific (not "just better")
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Framework ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **World and Setting** is defined
|
||||
- [ ] **Narrative Approach** matches game type
|
||||
- [ ] **Content Volume** is estimated (rough order of magnitude)
|
||||
- [ ] Playtime expectations are set
|
||||
- [ ] Replayability approach is clear
|
||||
|
||||
## Art and Audio Direction ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Visual Style** is described with references
|
||||
- [ ] 2D vs. 3D is decided
|
||||
- [ ] **Audio Style** matches game mood
|
||||
- [ ] **Production Approach** is realistic for team/budget
|
||||
- [ ] Style complexity matches capabilities
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Key Risks** are honestly identified
|
||||
- [ ] **Technical Challenges** are documented
|
||||
- [ ] **Market Risks** are considered
|
||||
- [ ] **Mitigation Strategies** are actionable
|
||||
- [ ] Assumptions to validate are listed
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **MVP Definition** is truly minimal
|
||||
- [ ] MVP can validate core gameplay hypothesis
|
||||
- [ ] **Success Metrics** are specific and measurable
|
||||
- [ ] **Launch Goals** are realistic
|
||||
- [ ] You know what "done" looks like for MVP
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Immediate Actions** are prioritized
|
||||
- [ ] **Research Needs** are identified
|
||||
- [ ] **Open Questions** are documented
|
||||
- [ ] Critical path is clear
|
||||
- [ ] Blockers are identified
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Quality ✓
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Brief is clear and concise (3-5 pages)
|
||||
- [ ] Sections are internally consistent
|
||||
- [ ] Scope is realistic for team/timeline/budget
|
||||
- [ ] Vision is compelling and achievable
|
||||
- [ ] You're excited to build this game
|
||||
- [ ] Team/stakeholders can understand the vision
|
||||
|
||||
## Red Flags 🚩
|
||||
|
||||
Watch for these warning signs:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] ❌ Scope too large for team/timeline
|
||||
- [ ] ❌ Unclear core loop or pillars
|
||||
- [ ] ❌ Target audience is "everyone"
|
||||
- [ ] ❌ Differentiators are vague or weak
|
||||
- [ ] ❌ No prototype plan for risky mechanics
|
||||
- [ ] ❌ Budget/timeline is wishful thinking
|
||||
- [ ] ❌ Market is saturated with no clear positioning
|
||||
- [ ] ❌ MVP is not actually minimal
|
||||
|
||||
## Ready for Next Steps?
|
||||
|
||||
If you've checked most boxes and have no major red flags:
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Ready to proceed to:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Prototype core mechanic
|
||||
- GDD workflow
|
||||
- Team/stakeholder review
|
||||
- Market validation
|
||||
|
||||
⚠️ **Need more work if:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Multiple sections incomplete
|
||||
- Red flags present
|
||||
- Team/stakeholders don't align
|
||||
- Core concept unclear
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
_This checklist is a guide, not a gate. Use your judgment based on project needs._
|
||||
@@ -1,371 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Game Brief - Interactive Workflow Instructions
|
||||
|
||||
<critical>The workflow execution engine is governed by: {project-root}/bmad/core/tasks/workflow.xml</critical>
|
||||
<critical>You MUST have already loaded and processed: {installed_path}/workflow.yaml</critical>
|
||||
<critical>Communicate all responses in {communication_language} and language MUST be tailored to {user_skill_level}</critical>
|
||||
<critical>Generate all documents in {document_output_language}</critical>
|
||||
|
||||
<critical>DOCUMENT OUTPUT: Concise, professional, game-design focused. Use tables/lists over prose. User skill level ({user_skill_level}) affects conversation style ONLY, not document content.</critical>
|
||||
|
||||
<workflow>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="0" goal="Validate workflow readiness" tag="workflow-status">
|
||||
<action>Check if {output_folder}/bmm-workflow-status.yaml exists</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="status file not found">
|
||||
<output>No workflow status file found. Game brief is optional - you can continue without status tracking.</output>
|
||||
<action>Set standalone_mode = true</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="status file found">
|
||||
<action>Load the FULL file: {output_folder}/bmm-workflow-status.yaml</action>
|
||||
<action>Parse workflow_status section</action>
|
||||
<action>Check status of "game-brief" workflow</action>
|
||||
<action>Get project_level from YAML metadata</action>
|
||||
<action>Find first non-completed workflow (next expected workflow)</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="project_type != 'game'">
|
||||
<output>Note: This is a {{project_type}} project. Game brief is designed for game projects.</output>
|
||||
<ask>Continue with game brief anyway? (y/n)</ask>
|
||||
<check if="n">
|
||||
<action>Exit workflow</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="game-brief status is file path (already completed)">
|
||||
<output>⚠️ Game Brief already completed: {{game-brief status}}</output>
|
||||
<ask>Re-running will overwrite the existing brief. Continue? (y/n)</ask>
|
||||
<check if="n">
|
||||
<output>Exiting. Use workflow-status to see your next step.</output>
|
||||
<action>Exit workflow</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="game-brief is not the next expected workflow (latter items are completed already in the list)">
|
||||
<output>⚠️ Next expected workflow: {{next_workflow}}. Game Brief is out of sequence.</output>
|
||||
<ask>Continue with Game Brief anyway? (y/n)</ask>
|
||||
<check if="n">
|
||||
<output>Exiting. Run {{next_workflow}} instead.</output>
|
||||
<action>Exit workflow</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<action>Set standalone_mode = false</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="1" goal="Initialize game brief session">
|
||||
<action>Welcome the user in {communication_language} to the Game Brief creation process</action>
|
||||
<action>Explain this is a collaborative process to define their game vision, capturing the essence of what they want to create</action>
|
||||
<action>Ask for the working title of their game</action>
|
||||
<template-output>game_name</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="1" goal="Gather available inputs and context">
|
||||
<action>Explore what existing materials the user has available to inform the brief</action>
|
||||
<action>Offer options for input sources: market research, brainstorming results, competitive analysis, design notes, reference games, or starting fresh</action>
|
||||
<action>If documents are provided, load and analyze them to extract key insights, themes, and patterns</action>
|
||||
<action>Engage the user about their core vision: what gameplay experience they want to create, what emotions players should feel, and what sparked this game idea</action>
|
||||
<action>Build initial understanding through conversational exploration rather than rigid questioning</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>initial_context</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="2" goal="Choose collaboration mode">
|
||||
<ask>How would you like to work through the brief?
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Interactive Mode** - We'll work through each section together, discussing and refining as we go
|
||||
**2. YOLO Mode** - I'll generate a complete draft based on our conversation so far, then we'll refine it together
|
||||
|
||||
Which approach works best for you?</ask>
|
||||
|
||||
<action>Store the user's preference for mode</action>
|
||||
<template-output>collaboration_mode</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="3" goal="Define game vision" if="collaboration_mode == 'interactive'">
|
||||
<action>Guide user to articulate their game vision across three levels of depth</action>
|
||||
<action>Help them craft a one-sentence core concept that captures the essence (reference successful games like "A roguelike deck-builder where you climb a mysterious spire" as examples)</action>
|
||||
<action>Develop an elevator pitch (2-3 sentences) that would compel a publisher or player - refine until it's concise but hooks attention</action>
|
||||
<action>Explore their aspirational vision statement: the experience they want to create and what makes it meaningful - ensure it's ambitious yet achievable</action>
|
||||
<action>Refine through conversation, challenging vague language and elevating compelling ideas</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>core_concept</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>elevator_pitch</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>vision_statement</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="4" goal="Identify target market" if="collaboration_mode == 'interactive'">
|
||||
<action>Guide user to define their primary target audience with specific demographics, gaming preferences, and behavioral characteristics</action>
|
||||
<action>Push for specificity beyond generic descriptions like "people who like fun games" - challenge vague answers</action>
|
||||
<action>Explore secondary audiences if applicable and how their needs might differ</action>
|
||||
<action>Investigate the market context: opportunity size, competitive landscape, similar successful games, and why now is the right time</action>
|
||||
<action>Help identify a realistic and reachable audience segment based on evidence or well-reasoned assumptions</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>primary_audience</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>secondary_audience</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>market_context</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="5" goal="Define game fundamentals" if="collaboration_mode == 'interactive'">
|
||||
<action>Help user identify 2-4 core gameplay pillars that fundamentally define their game - everything should support these pillars</action>
|
||||
<action>Provide examples from successful games for inspiration (Hollow Knight's "tight controls + challenging combat + rewarding exploration")</action>
|
||||
<action>Explore what the player actually DOES - core actions, key systems, and interaction models</action>
|
||||
<action>Define the emotional experience goals: what feelings are you designing for (tension/relief, mastery/growth, creativity/expression, discovery/surprise)</action>
|
||||
<action>Ensure pillars are specific and measurable, focusing on player actions rather than implementation details</action>
|
||||
<action>Connect mechanics directly to emotional experiences through guided discussion</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>core_gameplay_pillars</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>primary_mechanics</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>player_experience_goals</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="6" goal="Define scope and constraints" if="collaboration_mode == 'interactive'">
|
||||
<action>Help user establish realistic project constraints across all key dimensions</action>
|
||||
<action>Explore target platforms and prioritization (PC, console, mobile, web)</action>
|
||||
<action>Discuss development timeline: release targets, fixed deadlines, phased release strategies</action>
|
||||
<action>Investigate budget reality: funding source, asset creation costs, marketing, tools and software</action>
|
||||
<action>Assess team resources: size, roles, availability, skills gaps, outsourcing needs</action>
|
||||
<action>Define technical constraints: engine choice, performance targets, file size limits, accessibility requirements</action>
|
||||
<action>Push for realism about scope - identify potential blockers early and document resource assumptions</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>target_platforms</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>development_timeline</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>budget_considerations</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>team_resources</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>technical_constraints</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="7" goal="Establish reference framework" if="collaboration_mode == 'interactive'">
|
||||
<action>Guide user to identify 3-5 inspiration games and articulate what they're drawing from each (mechanics, feel, art style) and explicitly what they're NOT taking</action>
|
||||
<action>Conduct competitive analysis: identify direct and indirect competitors, analyze what they do well and poorly, and define how this game will differ</action>
|
||||
<action>Explore key differentiators and unique value proposition - what's the hook that makes players choose this game over alternatives</action>
|
||||
<action>Challenge "just better" thinking - push for genuine, specific differentiation that's actually valuable to players</action>
|
||||
<action>Validate that differentiators are concrete, achievable, and compelling</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>inspiration_games</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>competitive_analysis</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>key_differentiators</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="8" goal="Define content framework" if="collaboration_mode == 'interactive'">
|
||||
<action>Explore the game's world and setting: location, time period, world-building depth, narrative importance, and genre context</action>
|
||||
<action>Define narrative approach: story-driven/light/absent, linear/branching/emergent, delivery methods (cutscenes, dialogue, environmental), writing scope</action>
|
||||
<action>Estimate content volume realistically: playthrough length, level/stage count, replayability strategy, total asset volume</action>
|
||||
<action>Identify if a dedicated narrative workflow will be needed later based on story complexity</action>
|
||||
<action>Flag content-heavy areas that require detailed planning and resource allocation</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>world_setting</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>narrative_approach</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>content_volume</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="9" goal="Define art and audio direction" if="collaboration_mode == 'interactive'">
|
||||
<action>Explore visual style direction: art style preference, color palette and mood, reference games/images, 2D vs 3D, animation requirements</action>
|
||||
<action>Define audio style: music genre and mood, SFX approach, voice acting scope, audio's importance to gameplay</action>
|
||||
<action>Discuss production approach: in-house creation vs outsourcing, asset store usage, AI/generative tools, style complexity vs team capability</action>
|
||||
<action>Ensure art and audio vision aligns realistically with budget and team skills - identify potential production bottlenecks early</action>
|
||||
<action>Note if a comprehensive style guide will be needed for consistent production</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>visual_style</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>audio_style</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>production_approach</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="10" goal="Assess risks" if="collaboration_mode == 'interactive'">
|
||||
<action>Facilitate honest risk assessment across all dimensions - what could prevent completion, what could make it unfun, what assumptions might be wrong</action>
|
||||
<action>Identify technical challenges: unproven elements, performance concerns, platform-specific issues, tool dependencies</action>
|
||||
<action>Explore market risks: saturation, trend dependency, competition intensity, discoverability challenges</action>
|
||||
<action>For each major risk, develop actionable mitigation strategies - how to validate assumptions, backup plans, early prototyping opportunities</action>
|
||||
<action>Prioritize risks by impact and likelihood, focusing on proactive mitigation rather than passive worry</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>key_risks</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>technical_challenges</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>market_risks</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>mitigation_strategies</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="11" goal="Define success criteria" if="collaboration_mode == 'interactive'">
|
||||
<action>Define the MVP (Minimum Playable Version) - what's the absolute minimum where the core loop is fun and complete, with essential content only</action>
|
||||
<action>Establish specific, measurable success metrics: player acquisition, retention rates, session length, completion rate, review scores, revenue targets, community engagement</action>
|
||||
<action>Set concrete launch goals: first-month sales/downloads, review score targets, streamer/press coverage, community size</action>
|
||||
<action>Push for specificity and measurability - challenge vague aspirations with "how will you measure that?"</action>
|
||||
<action>Clearly distinguish between MVP milestones and full release goals, ensuring all targets are realistic given resources</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>mvp_definition</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>success_metrics</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>launch_goals</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="12" goal="Identify immediate next steps" if="collaboration_mode == 'interactive'">
|
||||
<action>Identify immediate actions to take right after this brief: prototype core mechanics, create art style tests, validate technical feasibility, build vertical slice, playtest with target audience</action>
|
||||
<action>Determine research needs: market validation, technical proof of concept, player interest testing, competitive deep-dive</action>
|
||||
<action>Document open questions and uncertainties: unresolved design questions, technical unknowns, market validation needs, resource/budget questions</action>
|
||||
<action>Create actionable, specific next steps - prioritize by importance and dependency</action>
|
||||
<action>Identify blockers that must be resolved before moving forward</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>immediate_actions</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>research_needs</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>open_questions</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- YOLO Mode - Generate everything then refine -->
|
||||
<step n="3" goal="Generate complete brief draft" if="collaboration_mode == 'yolo'">
|
||||
<action>Based on initial context and any provided documents, generate a complete game brief covering all sections</action>
|
||||
<action>Make reasonable assumptions where information is missing</action>
|
||||
<action>Flag areas that need user validation with [NEEDS CONFIRMATION] tags</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>core_concept</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>elevator_pitch</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>vision_statement</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>primary_audience</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>secondary_audience</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>market_context</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>core_gameplay_pillars</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>primary_mechanics</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>player_experience_goals</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>target_platforms</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>development_timeline</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>budget_considerations</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>team_resources</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>technical_constraints</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>inspiration_games</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>competitive_analysis</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>key_differentiators</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>world_setting</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>narrative_approach</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>content_volume</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>visual_style</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>audio_style</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>production_approach</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>key_risks</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>technical_challenges</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>market_risks</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>mitigation_strategies</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>mvp_definition</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>success_metrics</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>launch_goals</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>immediate_actions</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>research_needs</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>open_questions</template-output>
|
||||
|
||||
<action>Present the complete draft to the user</action>
|
||||
<ask>Here's the complete game brief draft. What would you like to adjust or refine?</ask>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="4" goal="Refine brief sections" repeat="until-approved" if="collaboration_mode == 'yolo'">
|
||||
<ask>Which section would you like to refine?
|
||||
|
||||
1. Game Vision
|
||||
2. Target Market
|
||||
3. Game Fundamentals
|
||||
4. Scope and Constraints
|
||||
5. Reference Framework
|
||||
6. Content Framework
|
||||
7. Art and Audio Direction
|
||||
8. Risk Assessment
|
||||
9. Success Criteria
|
||||
10. Next Steps
|
||||
11. Save and continue</ask>
|
||||
|
||||
<action>Work with user to refine selected section</action>
|
||||
<action>Update relevant template outputs</action>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- Final steps for both modes -->
|
||||
<step n="13" goal="Create executive summary">
|
||||
<action>Synthesize all sections into a compelling executive summary</action>
|
||||
<action>Include:
|
||||
- Game concept in 1-2 sentences
|
||||
- Target audience and market
|
||||
- Core gameplay pillars
|
||||
- Key differentiators
|
||||
- Success vision</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>executive_summary</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="14" goal="Compile supporting materials">
|
||||
<action>If research documents were provided, create a summary of key findings</action>
|
||||
<action>Document any stakeholder input received during the process</action>
|
||||
<action>Compile list of reference games and resources</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>research_summary</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>stakeholder_input</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>references</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="15" goal="Final review and handoff">
|
||||
<action>Generate the complete game brief document</action>
|
||||
<action>Review all sections for completeness and consistency</action>
|
||||
<action>Flag any areas that need design attention with [DESIGN-TODO] tags</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<ask>The game brief is complete! Would you like to:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Review the entire document
|
||||
2. Make final adjustments
|
||||
3. Generate an executive summary version (3-page limit)
|
||||
4. Save and prepare for GDD creation
|
||||
|
||||
This brief will serve as the primary input for creating the Game Design Document (GDD).
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended next steps:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Create prototype of core mechanic
|
||||
- Proceed to GDD workflow: `workflow gdd`
|
||||
- Validate assumptions with target players</ask>
|
||||
|
||||
<check if="user chooses option 3 (executive summary)">
|
||||
<action>Create condensed 3-page executive brief focusing on: core concept, target market, gameplay pillars, key differentiators, and success criteria</action>
|
||||
<action>Save as: {output_folder}/game-brief-executive-{{game_name}}-{{date}}.md</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<template-output>final_brief</template-output>
|
||||
<template-output>executive_brief</template-output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
<step n="16" goal="Update status and complete" tag="workflow-status">
|
||||
<check if="standalone_mode != true">
|
||||
<action>Load the FULL file: {output_folder}/bmm-workflow-status.yaml</action>
|
||||
<action>Find workflow_status key "game-brief"</action>
|
||||
<critical>ONLY write the file path as the status value - no other text, notes, or metadata</critical>
|
||||
<action>Update workflow_status["game-brief"] = "{output_folder}/bmm-game-brief-{{game_name}}-{{date}}.md"</action>
|
||||
<action>Save file, preserving ALL comments and structure including STATUS DEFINITIONS</action>
|
||||
|
||||
<action>Find first non-completed workflow in workflow_status (next workflow to do)</action>
|
||||
<action>Determine next agent from path file based on next workflow</action>
|
||||
</check>
|
||||
|
||||
<output>**✅ Game Brief Complete, {user_name}!**
|
||||
|
||||
**Brief Document:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Game brief saved to {output_folder}/bmm-game-brief-{{game_name}}-{{date}}.md
|
||||
|
||||
{{#if standalone_mode != true}}
|
||||
**Status Updated:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Progress tracking updated: game-brief marked complete
|
||||
- Next workflow: {{next_workflow}}
|
||||
{{else}}
|
||||
**Note:** Running in standalone mode (no progress tracking)
|
||||
{{/if}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Next Steps:**
|
||||
|
||||
{{#if standalone_mode != true}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Next workflow:** {{next_workflow}} ({{next_agent}} agent)
|
||||
- **Optional:** Consider creating a prototype of core mechanic or validating assumptions with target players before proceeding
|
||||
|
||||
Check status anytime with: `workflow-status`
|
||||
{{else}}
|
||||
Since no workflow is in progress:
|
||||
|
||||
- Refer to the BMM workflow guide if unsure what to do next
|
||||
- Or run `workflow-init` to create a workflow path and get guided next steps
|
||||
{{/if}}
|
||||
</output>
|
||||
</step>
|
||||
|
||||
</workflow>
|
||||
@@ -1,205 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Game Brief: {{game_name}}
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** {{date}}
|
||||
**Author:** {{user_name}}
|
||||
**Status:** Draft for GDD Development
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
{{executive_summary}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Game Vision
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Concept
|
||||
|
||||
{{core_concept}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Elevator Pitch
|
||||
|
||||
{{elevator_pitch}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Vision Statement
|
||||
|
||||
{{vision_statement}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Target Market
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Audience
|
||||
|
||||
{{primary_audience}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Secondary Audience
|
||||
|
||||
{{secondary_audience}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Context
|
||||
|
||||
{{market_context}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Game Fundamentals
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Gameplay Pillars
|
||||
|
||||
{{core_gameplay_pillars}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Primary Mechanics
|
||||
|
||||
{{primary_mechanics}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Player Experience Goals
|
||||
|
||||
{{player_experience_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope and Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
### Target Platforms
|
||||
|
||||
{{target_platforms}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Development Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
{{development_timeline}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Budget Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
{{budget_considerations}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Team Resources
|
||||
|
||||
{{team_resources}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
{{technical_constraints}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Reference Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### Inspiration Games
|
||||
|
||||
{{inspiration_games}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Competitive Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
{{competitive_analysis}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Differentiators
|
||||
|
||||
{{key_differentiators}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### World and Setting
|
||||
|
||||
{{world_setting}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Narrative Approach
|
||||
|
||||
{{narrative_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Content Volume
|
||||
|
||||
{{content_volume}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Art and Audio Direction
|
||||
|
||||
### Visual Style
|
||||
|
||||
{{visual_style}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Audio Style
|
||||
|
||||
{{audio_style}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Production Approach
|
||||
|
||||
{{production_approach}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Risks
|
||||
|
||||
{{key_risks}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Technical Challenges
|
||||
|
||||
{{technical_challenges}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Market Risks
|
||||
|
||||
{{market_risks}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Mitigation Strategies
|
||||
|
||||
{{mitigation_strategies}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### MVP Definition
|
||||
|
||||
{{mvp_definition}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
{{success_metrics}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Launch Goals
|
||||
|
||||
{{launch_goals}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate Actions
|
||||
|
||||
{{immediate_actions}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Research Needs
|
||||
|
||||
{{research_needs}}
|
||||
|
||||
### Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
{{open_questions}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Appendices
|
||||
|
||||
### A. Research Summary
|
||||
|
||||
{{research_summary}}
|
||||
|
||||
### B. Stakeholder Input
|
||||
|
||||
{{stakeholder_input}}
|
||||
|
||||
### C. References
|
||||
|
||||
{{references}}
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
_This Game Brief serves as the foundational input for Game Design Document (GDD) creation._
|
||||
|
||||
_Next Steps: Use the `workflow gdd` command to create detailed game design documentation._
|
||||
@@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Game Brief - Interactive Workflow Configuration
|
||||
name: game-brief
|
||||
description: "Interactive game brief creation workflow that guides users through defining their game vision with multiple input sources and conversational collaboration"
|
||||
author: "BMad"
|
||||
|
||||
# Critical variables from config
|
||||
config_source: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/config.yaml"
|
||||
output_folder: "{config_source}:output_folder"
|
||||
user_name: "{config_source}:user_name"
|
||||
communication_language: "{config_source}:communication_language"
|
||||
document_output_language: "{config_source}:document_output_language"
|
||||
user_skill_level: "{config_source}:user_skill_level"
|
||||
date: system-generated
|
||||
|
||||
# Optional input documents
|
||||
recommended_inputs:
|
||||
- market_research: "Market research document (optional)"
|
||||
- brainstorming_results: "Brainstorming session outputs (optional)"
|
||||
- competitive_analysis: "Competitive game analysis (optional)"
|
||||
- initial_ideas: "Initial game ideas or notes (optional)"
|
||||
- reference_games: "List of inspiration games (optional)"
|
||||
|
||||
# Module path and component files
|
||||
installed_path: "{project-root}/bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/game-brief"
|
||||
template: "{installed_path}/template.md"
|
||||
instructions: "{installed_path}/instructions.md"
|
||||
validation: "{installed_path}/checklist.md"
|
||||
|
||||
# Output configuration
|
||||
default_output_file: "{output_folder}/game-brief-{{game_name}}-{{date}}.md"
|
||||
|
||||
standalone: true
|
||||
|
||||
web_bundle:
|
||||
name: "game-brief"
|
||||
description: "Interactive game brief creation workflow that guides users through defining their game vision with multiple input sources and conversational collaboration"
|
||||
author: "BMad"
|
||||
instructions: "bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/game-brief/instructions.md"
|
||||
validation: "bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/game-brief/checklist.md"
|
||||
template: "bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/game-brief/template.md"
|
||||
web_bundle_files:
|
||||
- "bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/game-brief/instructions.md"
|
||||
- "bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/game-brief/checklist.md"
|
||||
- "bmad/bmm/workflows/1-analysis/game-brief/template.md"
|
||||
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ Would you like me to strengthen any areas with additional research?"
|
||||
{{#if standalone_mode != true}}
|
||||
|
||||
- **Next workflow:** {{next_workflow}} ({{next_agent}} agent)
|
||||
- **Optional:** Review findings with stakeholders, or run additional analysis workflows (product-brief, game-brief, etc.)
|
||||
- **Optional:** Review findings with stakeholders, or run additional analysis workflows (product-brief for software, or install BMGD module for game-brief)
|
||||
|
||||
Check status anytime with: `workflow-status`
|
||||
{{else}}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user