mirror of
https://github.com/bmadcode/BMAD-METHOD.git
synced 2025-12-29 16:14:59 +00:00
docs updated
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
last-redoc-date: 2025-10-01
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Game Brainstorming Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
This workflow employs structured ideation methodologies to generate and refine game concepts through systematic creative exploration. It leverages five distinct brainstorming techniques—SCAMPER, Mind Mapping, Lotus Blossom, Six Thinking Hats, and Random Word Association—each applied in isolation to produce diverse conceptual approaches. The workflow emphasizes iterative refinement where initial concepts are evaluated against design pillars, technical feasibility, and market positioning to identify the most promising directions.
|
||||
|
||||
The system operates through a game-specific context framework that considers platform constraints, target audience characteristics, monetization models, and core gameplay pillars. Each brainstorming method generates distinct artifacts: SCAMPER produces systematic modification analyses, Mind Mapping reveals conceptual hierarchies, Lotus Blossom creates radial expansion patterns, Six Thinking Hats enforces multi-perspective evaluation, and Random Word Association drives lateral thinking breakthroughs. The workflow culminates in a consolidated concept document that synthesizes the strongest elements from each method into cohesive game proposals.
|
||||
|
||||
Critical to this workflow is its emphasis on constraint-driven creativity. The game-context.md framework establishes technical boundaries (platform capabilities, performance targets), market parameters (genre conventions, competitive positioning), and design philosophy (accessibility requirements, monetization ethics) that ground creative exploration in practical realities. This prevents ideation from drifting into infeasible territory while maintaining creative ambition.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
bmad bmm 1-analysis brainstorm-game
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- **Game Context Document**: Platform specifications, genre preferences, technical constraints, target audience demographics, monetization approach, and core design pillars
|
||||
- **Initial Concept Seed** (optional): High-level game idea or theme to guide brainstorming direction
|
||||
|
||||
## Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
- **Method-Specific Artifacts**: Five separate brainstorming documents, each applying a different ideation methodology to the concept space
|
||||
- **Consolidated Concept Document**: Synthesized game concepts with feasibility assessments, unique value propositions, and recommended next steps
|
||||
- **Design Pillar Alignment Matrix**: Evaluation of each concept against stated design objectives and technical constraints
|
||||
|
||||
## Brainstorming Methods
|
||||
|
||||
| Method | Focus | Output Characteristics |
|
||||
| ----------------------- | ------------------------ | ---------------------------------- |
|
||||
| SCAMPER | Systematic modification | Structured transformation analysis |
|
||||
| Mind Mapping | Hierarchical exploration | Visual concept relationships |
|
||||
| Lotus Blossom | Radial expansion | Layered thematic development |
|
||||
| Six Thinking Hats | Multi-perspective | Balanced evaluation framework |
|
||||
| Random Word Association | Lateral thinking | Unexpected conceptual combinations |
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
last-redoc-date: 2025-10-01
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Project Brainstorming Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
This workflow facilitates structured ideation for non-game software projects through systematic exploration of problem spaces, solution architectures, and implementation strategies. Unlike traditional requirement gathering, it employs creative techniques to uncover non-obvious approaches and identify innovative solutions that address core business needs while considering technical constraints and organizational capabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
The workflow operates through a project-specific context framework that captures business objectives, technical environment, stakeholder needs, and organizational constraints. It generates multiple solution vectors through parallel ideation tracks: architectural approaches, user experience paradigms, integration patterns, and value delivery mechanisms. Each track produces concrete proposals that are evaluated against feasibility, impact, and alignment with strategic objectives.
|
||||
|
||||
Critical differentiators include its focus on solution innovation rather than requirement enumeration, emphasis on technical-business alignment from inception, and structured approach to surfacing hidden assumptions. The workflow produces actionable outputs that directly feed into Product Brief development, ensuring that creative exploration translates into concrete planning artifacts.
|
||||
|
||||
## Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
bmad bmm 1-analysis brainstorm-project
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- **Project Context Document**: Business objectives, technical environment, stakeholder landscape, organizational constraints, success criteria, and known pain points
|
||||
- **Problem Statement** (optional): Core business challenge or opportunity driving the project
|
||||
|
||||
## Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
- **Solution Architecture Proposals**: Multiple technical approaches with trade-off analysis and feasibility assessments
|
||||
- **Value Delivery Framework**: Prioritized feature concepts aligned with business objectives and user needs
|
||||
- **Risk and Opportunity Analysis**: Identified technical dependencies, integration challenges, and innovation opportunities
|
||||
- **Strategic Recommendation**: Synthesized direction with rationale and implementation considerations
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user