docs: massive documentation overhaul + introduce Paige (Documentation Guide agent)

## 📚 Complete Documentation Restructure

**BMM Documentation Hub Created:**
- New centralized documentation system at `src/modules/bmm/docs/`
- 18 comprehensive guides organized by topic (7000+ lines total)
- Clear learning paths for greenfield, brownfield, and quick spec flows
- Professional technical writing standards throughout

**New Documentation:**
- `README.md` - Complete documentation hub with navigation
- `quick-start.md` - 15-minute getting started guide
- `agents-guide.md` - Comprehensive 12-agent reference (45 min read)
- `party-mode.md` - Multi-agent collaboration guide (20 min read)
- `scale-adaptive-system.md` - Deep dive on Levels 0-4 (42 min read)
- `brownfield-guide.md` - Existing codebase development (53 min read)
- `quick-spec-flow.md` - Rapid Level 0-1 development (26 min read)
- `workflows-analysis.md` - Phase 1 workflows (12 min read)
- `workflows-planning.md` - Phase 2 workflows (19 min read)
- `workflows-solutioning.md` - Phase 3 workflows (13 min read)
- `workflows-implementation.md` - Phase 4 workflows (33 min read)
- `workflows-testing.md` - Testing & QA workflows (29 min read)
- `workflow-architecture-reference.md` - Architecture workflow deep-dive
- `workflow-document-project-reference.md` - Document-project workflow reference
- `enterprise-agentic-development.md` - Team collaboration patterns
- `faq.md` - Comprehensive Q&A covering all topics
- `glossary.md` - Complete terminology reference
- `troubleshooting.md` - Common issues and solutions

**Documentation Improvements:**
- Removed all version/date footers (git handles versioning)
- Agent customization docs now include full rebuild process
- Cross-referenced links between all guides
- Reading time estimates for all major docs
- Consistent professional formatting and structure

**Consolidated & Streamlined:**
- Module README (`src/modules/bmm/README.md`) streamlined to lean signpost
- Root README polished with better hierarchy and clear CTAs
- Moved docs from root `docs/` to module-specific locations
- Better separation of user docs vs. developer reference

## 🤖 New Agent: Paige (Documentation Guide)

**Role:** Technical documentation specialist and information architect

**Expertise:**
- Professional technical writing standards
- Documentation structure and organization
- Information architecture and navigation
- User-focused content design
- Style guide enforcement

**Status:** Work in progress - Paige will evolve as documentation needs grow

**Integration:**
- Listed in agents-guide.md, glossary.md, FAQ
- Available for all phases (documentation is continuous)
- Can be customized like all BMM agents

## 🔧 Additional Changes

- Updated agent manifest with Paige
- Updated workflow manifest with new documentation workflows
- Fixed workflow-to-agent mappings across all guides
- Improved root README with clearer Quick Start section
- Better module structure explanations
- Enhanced community links with Discord channel names

**Total Impact:**
- 18 new/restructured documentation files
- 7000+ lines of professional technical documentation
- Complete navigation system with cross-references
- Clear learning paths for all user types
- Foundation for knowledge base (coming in beta)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Brian Madison
2025-11-02 21:18:33 -06:00
parent 8a00f8ad70
commit cfedecbd53
359 changed files with 72374 additions and 809 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,363 @@
# ATDD Checklist - Epic {epic_num}, Story {story_num}: {story_title}
**Date:** {date}
**Author:** {user_name}
**Primary Test Level:** {primary_level}
---
## Story Summary
{Brief 2-3 sentence summary of the user story}
**As a** {user_role}
**I want** {feature_description}
**So that** {business_value}
---
## Acceptance Criteria
{List all testable acceptance criteria from the story}
1. {Acceptance criterion 1}
2. {Acceptance criterion 2}
3. {Acceptance criterion 3}
---
## Failing Tests Created (RED Phase)
### E2E Tests ({e2e_test_count} tests)
**File:** `{e2e_test_file_path}` ({line_count} lines)
{List each E2E test with its current status and expected failure reason}
-**Test:** {test_name}
- **Status:** RED - {failure_reason}
- **Verifies:** {what_this_test_validates}
### API Tests ({api_test_count} tests)
**File:** `{api_test_file_path}` ({line_count} lines)
{List each API test with its current status and expected failure reason}
-**Test:** {test_name}
- **Status:** RED - {failure_reason}
- **Verifies:** {what_this_test_validates}
### Component Tests ({component_test_count} tests)
**File:** `{component_test_file_path}` ({line_count} lines)
{List each component test with its current status and expected failure reason}
-**Test:** {test_name}
- **Status:** RED - {failure_reason}
- **Verifies:** {what_this_test_validates}
---
## Data Factories Created
{List all data factory files created with their exports}
### {Entity} Factory
**File:** `tests/support/factories/{entity}.factory.ts`
**Exports:**
- `create{Entity}(overrides?)` - Create single entity with optional overrides
- `create{Entity}s(count)` - Create array of entities
**Example Usage:**
```typescript
const user = createUser({ email: 'specific@example.com' });
const users = createUsers(5); // Generate 5 random users
```
---
## Fixtures Created
{List all test fixture files created with their fixture names and descriptions}
### {Feature} Fixtures
**File:** `tests/support/fixtures/{feature}.fixture.ts`
**Fixtures:**
- `{fixtureName}` - {description_of_what_fixture_provides}
- **Setup:** {what_setup_does}
- **Provides:** {what_test_receives}
- **Cleanup:** {what_cleanup_does}
**Example Usage:**
```typescript
import { test } from './fixtures/{feature}.fixture';
test('should do something', async ({ {fixtureName} }) => {
// {fixtureName} is ready to use with auto-cleanup
});
```
---
## Mock Requirements
{Document external services that need mocking and their requirements}
### {Service Name} Mock
**Endpoint:** `{HTTP_METHOD} {endpoint_url}`
**Success Response:**
```json
{
{success_response_example}
}
```
**Failure Response:**
```json
{
{failure_response_example}
}
```
**Notes:** {any_special_mock_requirements}
---
## Required data-testid Attributes
{List all data-testid attributes required in UI implementation for test stability}
### {Page or Component Name}
- `{data-testid-name}` - {description_of_element}
- `{data-testid-name}` - {description_of_element}
**Implementation Example:**
```tsx
<button data-testid="login-button">Log In</button>
<input data-testid="email-input" type="email" />
<div data-testid="error-message">{errorText}</div>
```
---
## Implementation Checklist
{Map each failing test to concrete implementation tasks that will make it pass}
### Test: {test_name_1}
**File:** `{test_file_path}`
**Tasks to make this test pass:**
- [ ] {Implementation task 1}
- [ ] {Implementation task 2}
- [ ] {Implementation task 3}
- [ ] Add required data-testid attributes: {list_of_testids}
- [ ] Run test: `{test_execution_command}`
- [ ] ✅ Test passes (green phase)
**Estimated Effort:** {effort_estimate} hours
---
### Test: {test_name_2}
**File:** `{test_file_path}`
**Tasks to make this test pass:**
- [ ] {Implementation task 1}
- [ ] {Implementation task 2}
- [ ] {Implementation task 3}
- [ ] Add required data-testid attributes: {list_of_testids}
- [ ] Run test: `{test_execution_command}`
- [ ] ✅ Test passes (green phase)
**Estimated Effort:** {effort_estimate} hours
---
## Running Tests
```bash
# Run all failing tests for this story
{test_command_all}
# Run specific test file
{test_command_specific_file}
# Run tests in headed mode (see browser)
{test_command_headed}
# Debug specific test
{test_command_debug}
# Run tests with coverage
{test_command_coverage}
```
---
## Red-Green-Refactor Workflow
### RED Phase (Complete) ✅
**TEA Agent Responsibilities:**
- ✅ All tests written and failing
- ✅ Fixtures and factories created with auto-cleanup
- ✅ Mock requirements documented
- ✅ data-testid requirements listed
- ✅ Implementation checklist created
**Verification:**
- All tests run and fail as expected
- Failure messages are clear and actionable
- Tests fail due to missing implementation, not test bugs
---
### GREEN Phase (DEV Team - Next Steps)
**DEV Agent Responsibilities:**
1. **Pick one failing test** from implementation checklist (start with highest priority)
2. **Read the test** to understand expected behavior
3. **Implement minimal code** to make that specific test pass
4. **Run the test** to verify it now passes (green)
5. **Check off the task** in implementation checklist
6. **Move to next test** and repeat
**Key Principles:**
- One test at a time (don't try to fix all at once)
- Minimal implementation (don't over-engineer)
- Run tests frequently (immediate feedback)
- Use implementation checklist as roadmap
**Progress Tracking:**
- Check off tasks as you complete them
- Share progress in daily standup
- Mark story as IN PROGRESS in `bmm-workflow-status.md`
---
### REFACTOR Phase (DEV Team - After All Tests Pass)
**DEV Agent Responsibilities:**
1. **Verify all tests pass** (green phase complete)
2. **Review code for quality** (readability, maintainability, performance)
3. **Extract duplications** (DRY principle)
4. **Optimize performance** (if needed)
5. **Ensure tests still pass** after each refactor
6. **Update documentation** (if API contracts change)
**Key Principles:**
- Tests provide safety net (refactor with confidence)
- Make small refactors (easier to debug if tests fail)
- Run tests after each change
- Don't change test behavior (only implementation)
**Completion:**
- All tests pass
- Code quality meets team standards
- No duplications or code smells
- Ready for code review and story approval
---
## Next Steps
1. **Review this checklist** with team in standup or planning
2. **Run failing tests** to confirm RED phase: `{test_command_all}`
3. **Begin implementation** using implementation checklist as guide
4. **Work one test at a time** (red → green for each)
5. **Share progress** in daily standup
6. **When all tests pass**, refactor code for quality
7. **When refactoring complete**, run `bmad sm story-done` to move story to DONE
---
## Knowledge Base References Applied
This ATDD workflow consulted the following knowledge fragments:
- **fixture-architecture.md** - Test fixture patterns with setup/teardown and auto-cleanup using Playwright's `test.extend()`
- **data-factories.md** - Factory patterns using `@faker-js/faker` for random test data generation with overrides support
- **component-tdd.md** - Component test strategies using Playwright Component Testing
- **network-first.md** - Route interception patterns (intercept BEFORE navigation to prevent race conditions)
- **test-quality.md** - Test design principles (Given-When-Then, one assertion per test, determinism, isolation)
- **test-levels-framework.md** - Test level selection framework (E2E vs API vs Component vs Unit)
See `tea-index.csv` for complete knowledge fragment mapping.
---
## Test Execution Evidence
### Initial Test Run (RED Phase Verification)
**Command:** `{test_command_all}`
**Results:**
```
{paste_test_run_output_showing_all_tests_failing}
```
**Summary:**
- Total tests: {total_test_count}
- Passing: 0 (expected)
- Failing: {total_test_count} (expected)
- Status: ✅ RED phase verified
**Expected Failure Messages:**
{list_expected_failure_messages_for_each_test}
---
## Notes
{Any additional notes, context, or special considerations for this story}
- {Note 1}
- {Note 2}
- {Note 3}
---
## Contact
**Questions or Issues?**
- Ask in team standup
- Tag @{tea_agent_username} in Slack/Discord
- Refer to `testarch/README.md` for workflow documentation
- Consult `testarch/knowledge/` for testing best practices
---
**Generated by BMad TEA Agent** - {date}