Major Enhancements:

- Installation path is now fully configurable, allowing users to specify custom installation directories during setup
  - Default installation location changed to .bmad (hidden directory) for cleaner project root organization

    Web Bundle Improvements:

    - All web bundles (single agent and team) now include party mode support for multi-agent collaboration!
    - Advanced elicitation capabilities integrated into standalone agents
    - All bundles enhanced with party mode agent manifests
    - Added default-party.csv files to bmm, bmgd, and cis module teams
    - The default party file is what will be used with single agent bundles. teams can customize for different party configurations before web bundling through a setting in the team yaml file
    - New web bundle outputs for all agents (analyst, architect, dev, pm, sm, tea, tech-writer, ux-designer, game-*, creative-squad)

    Phase 4 Workflow Updates (In Progress):

    - Initiated shift to separate phase 4 implementation artifacts from documentation
        - Phase 4 implementation artifacts (stories, code review, sprint plan, context files) will move to dedicated location outside docs folder
        - Installer questions and configuration added for artifact path selection
        - Updated workflow.yaml files for code-review, sprint-planning, story-context, epic-tech-context, and retrospective workflows to support this, but still might require some udpates

    Additional Changes:

    - New agent and action command header models for standardization
    - Enhanced web-bundle-activation-steps fragment
    - Updated web-bundler.js to support new structure
    - VS Code settings updated for new .bmad directory
    - Party mode instructions and workflow enhanced for better orchestration

   IDE Installer Updates:

    - Show version number of installer in cli
    - improved Installer UX
    - Gemini TOML Improved to have clear loading instructions with @ commands
    - All tools agent launcher mds improved to use a central file template critical indication isntead of hardcoding in 2 different locations.

.bmad/bmb/workflows/redoc/checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+# ReDoc Workflow Validation Checklist
+
+## Initialization and Setup
+
+- [ ] All BMAD convention documents loaded and understood
+- [ ] Target path validated and exists
+- [ ] Target type correctly identified (module/workflow/agent/folder)
+- [ ] Documentation execution plan created with reverse-tree order
+
+## File Analysis
+
+- [ ] All files in target scope read completely (no offset/limit usage)
+- [ ] Existing README.md files detected and last-redoc-date parsed
+- [ ] Massive folders (>10 items) identified for catalog document creation
+- [ ] Documentation depth levels calculated correctly
+
+## Leaf-Level Documentation (Workflows)
+
+- [ ] Each workflow's ALL files read: workflow.yaml, instructions.md, template.md, checklist.md
+- [ ] README.md includes frontmatter with current last-redoc-date
+- [ ] Description is 2-4 paragraphs of technical writer quality
+- [ ] Focuses on DISTINCTIVE features, not BMAD boilerplate conventions
+- [ ] Includes "Usage" section with invocation command
+- [ ] Includes "Inputs" and "Outputs" sections where applicable
+- [ ] Succinct and precise language used throughout
+
+## Leaf-Level Documentation (Agents)
+
+- [ ] Each agent file read completely including XML structure, commands, persona
+- [ ] README.md includes frontmatter with current last-redoc-date
+- [ ] Description is 1-3 paragraphs of technical writer quality
+- [ ] Lists all available commands clearly
+- [ ] Explains when to use this agent
+- [ ] Highlights unique capabilities vs standard agent patterns
+
+## Mid-Level Documentation (Folders)
+
+- [ ] All child README.md files read before generating folder README
+- [ ] Workflows categorized logically if massive folder (>10 items)
+- [ ] Agents categorized by type if massive folder (>10 items)
+- [ ] Catalog documents (WORKFLOWS-CATALOG.md, AGENTS-CATALOG.md) created for massive folders
+- [ ] Catalog documents include frontmatter with last-redoc-date
+- [ ] Folder README.md references catalog if one exists
+- [ ] Folder README.md is succinct (1-2 paragraphs + listings/links)
+- [ ] Notable/commonly-used items highlighted
+
+## Root Module Documentation
+
+- [ ] Module config.yaml read and understood
+- [ ] Workflows and agents folder READMEs read before creating root README
+- [ ] Root README includes frontmatter with current last-redoc-date
+- [ ] Module purpose clearly stated in 2-3 sentences
+- [ ] Links to /workflows/README.md and /agents/README.md included
+- [ ] 2-3 key workflows mentioned with context
+- [ ] 2-3 key agents mentioned with context
+- [ ] Configuration section highlights UNIQUE settings only
+- [ ] Usage section explains invocation patterns
+- [ ] BMAD convention knowledge applied (describes only distinctive aspects)
+
+## Quality Standards
+
+- [ ] All documentation uses proper BMAD terminology
+- [ ] Technical writer quality: clear, concise, professional
+- [ ] No placeholder text or generic descriptions remain
+- [ ] All links are valid and correctly formatted
+- [ ] Frontmatter syntax is correct and dates are current
+- [ ] No redundant explanation of standard BMAD patterns
+
+## Validation and Reporting
+
+- [ ] All planned documentation items created/updated
+- [ ] Frontmatter dates verified as current across all files
+- [ ] File paths and internal links validated
+- [ ] Summary report generated with counts and coverage
+- [ ] Files skipped (if any) documented with reasons
+
+## Git Diff Analysis (Optional Step)
+
+- [ ] last-redoc-date timestamps extracted correctly
+- [ ] Git log queried for changes since last redoc
+- [ ] Modified files identified and reported
+- [ ] Findings presented clearly to user
+
+## Final Validation
+
+- [ ] Documentation Coverage
+  - All README.md files in scope created/updated
+  - Catalog documents created where needed
+  - No documentation gaps identified
+
+- [ ] Execution Quality
+  - Reverse-tree order followed (leaf → root)
+  - Autonomous execution (minimal user prompts)
+  - Only clarification questions asked when truly necessary
+
+- [ ] Output Quality
+  - Technical precision maintained throughout
+  - Succinct descriptions (no verbose explanations)
+  - Professional documentation standards met