Major Enhancements:

- Installation path is now fully configurable, allowing users to specify custom installation directories during setup
  - Default installation location changed to .bmad (hidden directory) for cleaner project root organization

    Web Bundle Improvements:

    - All web bundles (single agent and team) now include party mode support for multi-agent collaboration!
    - Advanced elicitation capabilities integrated into standalone agents
    - All bundles enhanced with party mode agent manifests
    - Added default-party.csv files to bmm, bmgd, and cis module teams
    - The default party file is what will be used with single agent bundles. teams can customize for different party configurations before web bundling through a setting in the team yaml file
    - New web bundle outputs for all agents (analyst, architect, dev, pm, sm, tea, tech-writer, ux-designer, game-*, creative-squad)

    Phase 4 Workflow Updates (In Progress):

    - Initiated shift to separate phase 4 implementation artifacts from documentation
        - Phase 4 implementation artifacts (stories, code review, sprint plan, context files) will move to dedicated location outside docs folder
        - Installer questions and configuration added for artifact path selection
        - Updated workflow.yaml files for code-review, sprint-planning, story-context, epic-tech-context, and retrospective workflows to support this, but still might require some udpates

    Additional Changes:

    - New agent and action command header models for standardization
    - Enhanced web-bundle-activation-steps fragment
    - Updated web-bundler.js to support new structure
    - VS Code settings updated for new .bmad directory
    - Party mode instructions and workflow enhanced for better orchestration

   IDE Installer Updates:

    - Show version number of installer in cli
    - improved Installer UX
    - Gemini TOML Improved to have clear loading instructions with @ commands
    - All tools agent launcher mds improved to use a central file template critical indication isntead of hardcoding in 2 different locations.

.bmad/bmb/workflows/module-brief/checklist.md

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+# Module Brief Validation Checklist
+
+## Core Identity
+
+- [ ] Module code follows kebab-case convention
+- [ ] Module name is clear and memorable
+- [ ] Module category is identified
+- [ ] Target users are clearly defined
+- [ ] Unique value proposition is articulated
+
+## Vision and Concept
+
+- [ ] Problem being solved is clearly stated
+- [ ] Solution approach is explained
+- [ ] Module scope is well-defined
+- [ ] Success criteria are measurable
+
+## Agent Architecture
+
+- [ ] At least one agent is defined
+- [ ] Each agent has a clear role and purpose
+- [ ] Agent personalities are defined (if using personality themes)
+- [ ] Agent interactions are mapped (for multi-agent modules)
+- [ ] Key commands for each agent are listed
+
+## Workflow Ecosystem
+
+- [ ] Core workflows (2-3) are identified
+- [ ] Each workflow has clear purpose
+- [ ] Workflow complexity is assessed
+- [ ] Input/output for workflows is defined
+- [ ] Workflow categories are logical
+
+## User Experience
+
+- [ ] Primary use case is documented
+- [ ] User scenarios demonstrate value
+- [ ] User journey is realistic
+- [ ] Learning curve is considered
+- [ ] User feedback mechanism planned
+
+## Technical Planning
+
+- [ ] Data requirements are identified
+- [ ] Integration points are mapped
+- [ ] Dependencies are listed
+- [ ] Technical complexity is assessed
+- [ ] Performance requirements stated
+
+## Development Roadmap
+
+- [ ] Phase 1 MVP is clearly scoped
+- [ ] Phase 2 enhancements are outlined
+- [ ] Phase 3 polish items listed
+- [ ] Timeline estimates provided
+- [ ] Deliverables are specific
+
+## Risk Management
+
+- [ ] Technical risks identified
+- [ ] Usability risks considered
+- [ ] Scope risks acknowledged
+- [ ] Mitigation strategies provided
+- [ ] Open questions documented
+
+## Creative Elements (Optional)
+
+- [ ] Personality theme is consistent (if used)
+- [ ] Special features add value
+- [ ] Module feels cohesive
+- [ ] Fun elements don't compromise functionality
+
+## Documentation Quality
+
+- [ ] All sections have content (no empty placeholders)
+- [ ] Writing is clear and concise
+- [ ] Technical terms are explained
+- [ ] Examples are provided where helpful
+- [ ] Next steps are actionable
+
+## Implementation Readiness
+
+- [ ] Brief provides enough detail for create-module workflow
+- [ ] Agent specifications sufficient for create-agent workflow
+- [ ] Workflow descriptions ready for create-workflow
+- [ ] Resource requirements are clear
+- [ ] Success metrics are measurable
+
+## Final Validation
+
+- [ ] Module concept is viable
+- [ ] Scope is achievable
+- [ ] Value is clear
+- [ ] Brief is complete
+- [ ] Ready for development
+
+## Issues Found
+
+### Critical Issues
+
+<!-- Must be fixed before proceeding to build -->
+
+### Recommendations
+
+<!-- Suggested improvements -->
+
+### Nice-to-Haves
+
+<!-- Optional enhancements -->
+
+---
+
+**Validation Complete:** ⬜ Yes / ⬜ With Issues / ⬜ Needs Revision
+
+**Validated By:** **\*\*\*\***\_**\*\*\*\***
+**Date:** **\*\*\*\***\_**\*\*\*\***